Miranda decision.
Actually the 6th Amendment to the United States Constitution
"Notice of accusation" protects and retains that right
They have the right to know the charges, to have an attorney, to be appointed an attorney if they can't afford one, and the right not to talk.
Yes, also a lawyer, and that you don't have to testify against yourself.
The sixth amendment.
The right to know the charge(s) against him - the right to be faced with his accuser - the right to counsel - the right to be tried by a fair and impartial jury of his peers.
Not a court order! Guaranteed by the 6th Amendment to the US Constitution.
(in the US) At the time of arrest, the right to advised of his right to an attorney. The right to know the charges against him. The right to be considered for bail or bond. The right to a speedy trial. The right to a jury of his peers. The right to be confronted by the witnesses against him.
If you are arrested, meaning that a reasonable person would feel that he is not free to leave, a police officer must read you your Miranda rights IF he wishes question you and use your statements against you later. The police have no obligation to read you the Miranda rights if they do not wish to question you. The police can use things you say against you if you volunteer them without being asked.
Indictment
6
Very quietly and without advertising it, or your intentions of doing it, on a public message board. You do know that is against the law and you can be arrested for copyright infringement, right?
We don´t know entirerly all of the 33 charges , but all of the 33 charges that were ploted against him were all the things he had done, he also had to accept the constitution he hated, for eg p<loting against the revolutin , trying to run away.
Writ of Habeas Corpus.