I'm not totally sure, but I don't believe that there is one. Technically you are a free person and without charge. But, if/when the prosecutor once again has sufficient information to charge you, he may do so. Best thing - have your attorney petition the court to have the charge totally dismissed for "Want of Prosecutiron.'
Yes, a plaintiff can typically refile a dismissed case if it was dismissed without prejudice, meaning the case was dismissed for reasons that do not prevent refiling. However, if the case was dismissed with prejudice, the plaintiff generally cannot refile the same claim. It's important for the plaintiff to understand the specific reasons for dismissal and any applicable statutes of limitations before refiling. Consulting with a legal professional is advisable to navigate the complexities of the situation.
Yes, that's what 'without prejudice' means. When something is dismissed with prejudice, this is due to some kind of misconduct on the side of the party making the claim. They're then disallowed from refiling it. However if it's dismissed without prejudice, often due to a precedural error, it can be refiled.
If a case in Small Claims was dismissed with no prejudice, the plaintiff typically has the opportunity to refile within the statute of limitations period for that particular claim. The specific time frame for refiling will depend on the laws in the jurisdiction where the claim was filed. It is advisable for the plaintiff to consult with an attorney or research the specific laws in their area for accurate guidance.
3 years
No, not without refiling another "13".
If it was struck for cause, then no. If it was struck for other reasons, then maybe. The court will usually indicate in its ruling whether refiling is permitted by noting that it gives the parties leave to refile or that the claim is "dismissed without prejudice."
It is 180 days before you can refile
A non-suit without prejudice allows a plaintiff to voluntarily dismiss a case without affecting their right to refile it later. This means that the plaintiff can initiate a new lawsuit on the same claims in the future. However, it is important to adhere to any applicable statutes of limitations when refiling.
Depending upon the Rules of Civil Procedure and the governing case law of the State involved, there are a few possibilities. 1. If the case was voluntarily dismissed by the Plaintiff, the first dismissal is usually without prejudice. It can be refilled as long as the statute of limitations does not expire before the refiling. 2. If the case is closed after a determination on the merits, such as by the grant of a summary judgment, unless the ruling is appealed successfully, the closing of the file would be with prejudice. 3. If the case was closed by virtue of the court granting a motion to dismiss (usually the Plaintiff is given a chance to amend the complaint, but he may not), the same rule as in #1 above would apply.
That depends. If you mean that you were found not guilty, then no. That would be considered double jeopardy which is illegal. They can, however; charge you with other crimes as long as they dont rely on the original crime heavily as evidence.
No, except wait until the required time limit for refiling has expired and file another bankruptcy petition.
When a plaintiff voluntarily dismisses a case, they typically retain the right to refile the lawsuit, unless the dismissal is with prejudice, which prevents refiling. Upon refiling, the plaintiff must adhere to the relevant statutes of limitations and any procedural requirements set by the court. The court may also consider the reasons for the initial dismissal when assessing the refiled case. It's important for the plaintiff to ensure that any new filing addresses any issues that led to the initial dismissal to avoid similar outcomes.