0
Section 23
The consideration or object of an agreement is lawful, unless- it is forbidden by law 1[ ; or is of such a nature that, if permitted, it would defeat the provisions of any law; or is fraudulent; or involves or implies injury to the person or property of another or; the Court regards it as immoral, or opposed to public policy. In each of these cases, the consideration or object of an agreement is said to be unlawful. Every agreement of which the object or consideration is unlawful is void.
What else can I help you with?
What is Conclusion of unlawful and lawful consideration?
jngnjgngn
Consideration is totally unnecessary for the formation of contracts?
Consideration is actually absolutely necessary for the formation of contracts. A contract that does not have consideration is basically invalid unless one party can show detrimental reliance.
What types of contracts do not need consideration between both parties?
Certain types of contracts do not require consideration from both parties, including contracts under seal (also known as deeds), which are legally binding without mutual consideration. Additionally, unilateral contracts, where one party makes a promise in exchange for an act by another party, do not require reciprocal consideration. Promissory estoppel may also enforce a promise without consideration if one party relies on it to their detriment. Lastly, certain statutory contracts, like those involving public policy, may not require consideration.
What are the types of consideration?
http://www.lawyer-locater.com/Business/Contracts/125/
What circumstances would a contract be valid without any consideration?
from wawa(ums kal) :contracts under seal are valid without a consideration or perbaps
What constitute a valid contract?
An enforceable contract requires the existence of the following elements: an offer, an acceptance that mirrors the terms of the offer, consideration, and lawful subject matter. The "consideration" can consist of money, property, a promise--just about anything of value that is not unlawful. Generally, a court will not inquire into the adequacy of the consideration. "Consideration" might be thought of as the "this for that" or the "quid pro quo". Even of the other elements are present, a contract cannot be enforced if the object of it is unlawful. That is, one cannot, for example, enforce a contract to rob a bank.
Does The practitioner's guide Corbin on Contracts contain a section on consideration as a Quid Pro Quo?
Yes, it does, it is in the table of contents
Does consideration have to be exchanged by both parties when a contract is made?
Not necessarily. Sometimes in a contract for sale or purchase, a down payment is accepted as "consideration," but other types of contracts do not require any such offering.
Distinguish between summary unfair and unlawful dismisal?
Unfair dismissal refers to a situation where an employee is dismissed without a fair reason or without following the correct procedures. Unlawful dismissal occurs when an employee is dismissed in violation of anti-discrimination laws, employment contracts, or statutory protections. Unlawful dismissal often involves discrimination, retaliation, or dismissal for exercising legal rights.
What is a required element in all contracts by which a legal right or promise is exchanged for the act or promise of another person?
there should be a consideration for each party........
What has the author Antonino Cataudella written?
Antonino Cataudella has written: 'La donazione mista' -- subject(s): Consideration (Law), Gratuitous Contracts
What is the legal effect of a past consideration?
my attempt at trying to answer it is as follows. Consideration does not need to flow in any particular direction if the contract is offered before being accepted. But once it does start to flow the terms and conditions of the contract begin to come into effect and those terms, much like the terms of service of any Internet service offer of a contract may or may not include definitions of how long the offer of a contract is open for, with the general equity principal in common law jurisdictions that "nothing good lasts forever" and all unlawful contracts are "unenforceable anyway".
