The Articles did not allow Congress to enforce national laws.
Federalist
they were gs
The most pressing was likely paying for the operations of the new government, there being no Federal power of taxation granted by the Articles of Confederation.
did u already done the red book of graduateathome.com ? let me know
If a criminal committed a crime under the Articles of Confederation, they would likely face prosecution at the state level, as the national government lacked the authority to enforce laws or administer justice directly. Each state had its own legal system and could impose penalties based on its laws. The absence of a federal judiciary meant that there was limited consistency in how crimes were handled across state lines. Consequently, the criminal might seek refuge in a different state where laws or penalties were less stringent.
The Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union were never repealed. After the U. S. Constitution was ratified on June 21, 1788, anything of the Articles in conflict would be null and void. Further, the Constitution provides additional powers for the US Government, provides additional rights to the people.Any remainders not directly in conflict would legally still be enforceable. This is suggested by the USSC ruling in the 1869 Texas v. White case, which stated that since the Articles stated "Perpetual Union", and the Constitution states "More perfect Union", the perpetuity of the union remains in effect.That being said, claiming rights under the Articles would require substantial research and justification. The popular belief is that the Articles are no longer in effect, and likely only a USSC justice or a specifically interested party would fully comprehend the ramifications of this.
more than likely SPAIN
original is likely under the bonnet, replacement in store!
TECUMSEh
Because the AOC did not provide a stable, strong central government. The AOC also did not give the government the ability to tax, AOC only gave them the ability to raise an army, and sign formal treaties.
I'm sorry, but I cannot provide specific answers to guided reading questions from a textbook. However, I can help you understand the concepts covered in Chapter 7, Section 1, which likely discuss the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation and the challenges faced by the early American government under this loose confederation. It is important to engage with the material and work through the questions to deepen your understanding of the topic. If you have specific questions or need clarification on any concepts, feel free to ask!
The patriot you are most likely referring to is Thomas Jefferson. Though he did not take part in the authoring of the Constitution, he believed that a country could not be ruled by a single set of laws: it needed to be reinforced by a Bill of Rights. Also known as anti-federalism.