It all depends on what type of method was used to start the fire and the accelerant used to spread it. It could consist of almost ANY flammable item.
If due process was violated then the evidence is invalid, because it was not obtained in a legal manner. The prosecution has no evidence and you can probably get compensation of some kind.
Honestly, what kind of half-brained question is that?
Enough evidence that it was you that committed the offense.
Depends on the kind of evidence. Anywhere from days, in the case of bloodstains, to years -- even millennia -- for DNA.
Yes, it doesnt matterwhat kind of evidence there is, as long as it supports your case.
It is probably some kind of procedural request to the judge that does not involve the evidence in the trial.
Arson is a crime that has to do with burning of houses or properties
kind of court? Criminal court for adults, Family court for kids. Civil court of found not guilty for shoplifting and your suing them.
At this time, astronomers have found no evidence of the presence of volcanoes on Pluto. However, they do believe the planet is going through some kind of global warming on its surface.
Coral Eugene Watts was convicted primarily based on witness testimony and forensic evidence linking him to the crimes. Key evidence included fibers found on the victims that matched those from Watts' clothing and a pattern of his confessions to various individuals about his involvement in the murders. Additionally, his history of violent behavior and previous charges contributed to the case against him.
If either side believes it to have value in proving their case, it can be subpoened and entered into evidence. Bear in mind that the judge will have to be persuaded that it has probitive value, and does not violate "hearsay" concerns. it depends if anything in the book has "good" information to help whoever in the case and it doesn't have to be a murder case or a diary, it good be a notebook or and kind of case
There are a wide variety of circumstances in which a lawyer can prove a case of negligence against a nursing home. Evidence in these types of cases typically involve a video or audio recording of some kind demonstrating the accused negligence.