If the property taken, in anyway encroached on your civil rights, and you had warned the owner of this the property can be taken. Also if the property could be deemed abandoned, or deserted, it could be taken if its abandonment had been registered with the judicial system ( i.e. An abandoned car must be reported to the Highway Patrol or Sheriffs offices, and designated a time of claim, in which if the owner did not respond the car could be taken, or auctioned off by the county).
ANOTHER VIEW: The questioner starts off by clearly stating that he wrongfully took the property. If he knew it was wrong yet he took it anyway, he has completed the only two necessary steps to commit a crime. A criminal actaccompanied by a criminal intent. There is no way he can later plead ignorance.
embezzlement
TORT
The wrongful usurpations of my private property resulted in my suing the county police.
There is no wrongful birth. Only wrongful death.
If the homicide was justifiable, then it was not wrongful. This question seems to be contradictory. Police officers have the responsibility to protect society and enforce the laws. This responsibility causes them to run into people who may wish to harm them, and they need to handle the situation appropriately, which may mean using verbal commands, or it may mean using lethal force. As protecting society and enforcing the laws are important, a police officer's highest responsibility is going home that night. Officers do not have the luxury of retreating when a situation goes bad; they have the responsibility to handle it in order to prevent unnecessary casualties. The military's situation is very similar. The short answer is: There is no way to prevent homicide, whether it be wrongful or justified. Proper training may reduce the chance of a wrongful death, but it will not eradicate it.
EMBEZZLE - The wrongful or willful taking of money or property belonging to someone else after the money or property has lawfully come into the possession or control of the person taking it.
Torts deal with damage to property and persons. Wrongful death is a tort case that can be brought when someone dies because of something someone else did wrong. It is different then criminal law.
If you mean the parents have deeded or willed the property to the person who will become the executrix, then, yes it is legal and not unusual, absent evidence of wrongful persuasion or the like.
In Alabama, the parent would not be considered a wrongful death beneficiary of the adult child if there are no surviving spouse or children. In Nebraska, however, the parent could potentially be considered a wrongful death beneficiary if there are no surviving spouse or children. Each state has its own specific laws governing wrongful death claims.
That statement is not accurate. Trespass to personal property involves unlawful interference with someone else's property, while conversion refers to the wrongful possession or disposal of someone else's property. Both are distinct torts with different elements and legal implications.
General intent does not require an intentional unlawful action but only that a wrongful act was commtitted. Specific intent requires intentional unlawful action
There are three categories of Tort Law, intentional, negligence, and absolute liability. What Tort law is wrongful injury of someones property or a person.