Marshall could draw upon the Supremacy Clause, found in Article VI, Clause 2 of the Constitution, which establishes that federal law takes precedence over state law. He might also reference the Necessary and Proper Clause in Article I, Section 8, which grants Congress the authority to enact laws deemed necessary to execute its powers, thereby supporting a broader interpretation of federal authority. These clauses bolster the argument for federal supremacy in matters of national importance.
What part of the constitution could he have drawn upon to support his argument
What part of the constitution could he have drawn upon to support his argument
Answer is a
· The Federalist position on the adoption of the Constitution was the argument of the difficulties facing the Republic which could be overcome only by the new government based on the proposed Constitution.
The Marshall Court set the precedent that US laws could be devalidated if they were found to violate the US Constitution and gave the courts this power.
State governments could not do the job well on their own.
State governments could not do the job well on their own.
State governments could not do the job well on their own.
State governments could not do the job well on their own.
State governments could not do the job well on their own.
State governments could not do the job well on their own.
State governments could not do the job well on their own.