It could go either way because the um. murder ( yikes!) might not have left evidence behind that is credible for the jury, even though someone has a good peice of evidence it migh be dissmissed and the laws are unfair that way so i'd say bout 50 percent of em ya that bad but its a fact.
A person is never found innocent. A person is found guilty or not guilty at the verdict phase of a criminal trial.
No, in the legal system, a person is considered innocent until proven guilty.
In the legal system, the principle is "innocent until proven guilty." This means that a person is considered innocent unless proven otherwise in a court of law.
A person that is feeling guilty or innocent.
guilty untill proven innocent
A jury or court finds that the accused is not guilty, in reality the accused may not innocent.
Innocent means you are innocent of a crime.. That is you did not commit it. A court (jury/judge) will not find someone "innocent". They can't say that you did not commit a crime, they can only decide for "not guilty" if the evidence presented is enough that you are believed to have committed a crime (guilty) or not (not guilty).
In court trials, the two outcomes are either "guilty" or "not guilty". Therefore, any one who is not found to be guilty is declared to be not guilty and will be free to leave the court. There is not verdict of "innocent" in virtually any court in the world.
A jury is what determines if you are guilty, after being presented with evidence and hearing what the person accused is being charged for.
The statement "I am not guilty" is made because the person believes they are innocent, rather than for any other reason.
a person is presumed innocent until proven guilty
The principle of "innocent until proven guilty" originates from the legal system in ancient Rome and is a fundamental concept in modern legal systems around the world. It means that a person is considered innocent of a crime until proven guilty in a court of law.