geographic distributing
Wesberry v. Sanders, 376 US 1 (1964)Chief Justice Earl Warren (1953-1969) presided over Wesberry v. Sanders, (1964).For more information, see Related Questions, below.
IIHGG
One person's vote should be worth the same as another
Wesberry v. Sanders was settled by the Supreme Court in 1964. It didn't outlaw Gerrymandering, it instituted the "one person, one vote" rule which forces all congressional districts have nearly the same population. Gerrymandering hasn't been outlawed.
It changed the way many states drew district boundaries
It changed the way many states drew district boundaries.
Before the decision in Wesberry v Sanders, congressional districts were drawn essentially as the state legislature saw fit. After the decision, it became necessary to have close to the same number of voters in each district.
Supreme Court decision in Wesberry v. Sanders
The Supreme Court case Wesberry v. Sanders (1964) strengthened the principle of "one person, one vote" by ruling that congressional districts must have roughly equal populations. This decision aimed to ensure that each citizen's vote carries the same weight in the electoral process, thereby reinforcing the democratic principle of equal representation. The ruling mandated that states must redraw district lines to achieve population equality, addressing issues of disproportionate representation.
The main idea was that congressional districts need to be drawn so that there are an equal number of people in each.
Wesberry v. Sanders ruling
By ending the long-standing patterns of wide population variations among House districts and of rural over-representation in the chamber.