The Great Compromise
read the book
The apparent disagreement (as to whether or not the Holocaust took place) is mainly on the internet. Among professional historians there is no disagreement on this.
fgrgvfggftufhfujg
Contentious rivalry or disagreement among members of a group or organization
fgrgvfggftufhfujg
Legislative; Administrative and Judiciary
Some of the disagreements at the constitutional convention were that the delegates didn't want to make a whole new form of government. They didn't want it to be to strong or weak so that one state was more superior than the other. The delegates resolved this by doing more than just revising the Articles of Confederation and wrote a whole new constition.
Khilaf means "difference" or "disagreement" in Arabic. It is often used to refer to a situation where there is a disagreement or dispute among individuals or groups over a particular matter. In the context of Islamic jurisprudence, it can refer to differences of opinion among scholars on a religious issue.
There is disagreement among lawyers as to which 'parts' of the killings in Bosnia were genocide. There is agreement that the Srebrenica Massacre (about 8,400 killed) was an act of genocide. Beyond that there is disagreement, however.
Yes.
The disagreement was resolved through open communication, active listening, compromise, and a willingness from both parties to find a mutually beneficial solution. Both sides worked together to address their concerns and find common ground, leading to a resolution that satisfied everyone involved.
All the delegates believed that government had to protect peoples' rights to liberty and equality, and that a republic was the best form of government. The disagreement was about which people were entitled to vote and to hold office. They were divided over which should have more power, the individual states or national government.