0
What else can I help you with?
Chief justice john marshall believed in judicial review wich is?
A judicial review is a judicial body empowered to annul lower courts rulings if they conflict with the constitution. A judicial review, for instance, might rule that a state can not decree that everyone with blue eyes be imprisoned because this conflicts with federally granted rights.
Why is power of judicial review important?
because of the land owned by law and of all of what the constitution states. (recommend to look it up your own might not be true answer but is reasonable)
How might judicial review override the will of the majority?
The majority is white people right now but in a few years blacks and Mexicans will be the majority while white people will be the minority!
Does the court use of judicial review give it too much power compared to that of president and congress?
Judicial review is the authority of the judicial branch to review decisions and actions of the legislative and executive branches. Although some could say this gives it too much power, the decisions judges arrive at must be based on sound principles and have a reasonable basis in laws and the Constitution.
Did the court hold that there are no circumstances under which executive privilege might be asserted?
No, the court did not hold that there are no circumstances under which executive privilege might be asserted. Instead, it acknowledged that executive privilege can exist but emphasized that it is not absolute and must be balanced against the need for disclosure in certain situations. The court's ruling highlighted the importance of judicial oversight in determining the applicability of executive privilege in specific cases.
Where can you find a quote by one of our Founding Fathers referring to the danger of our country being ruled by the judicial system?
Jefferson was against the idea of judicial review...search "jefferson, judicial review," something might come up. I think Alexander Hamilton or James Madison wrote about the dangers of judicial power in the Federalist papers too, you might want to check that out. Actually, Hamilton, writing in the Federalist Papers expressed confidance that the Judicial Branch would be the weakest because it has neither the power of the sword nor the power of the purse. However, he did warn that liberty would be threatened if either of the powerful branches united with the Judicial. See Federalist Paper # 78. The later has not happened, but in some ways, because of the lack of committment to their oaths to uphold the Constitution, and willingness to let the Judicial Branch take all the heat for doing so, it seems as if the Judicial Branch has become the strongest. The truth is, however, that the people still have the power to make those weak members do their jobs. The threat to fire is a powerful, if under-used tool in our hands (Prof. Jeffrey.)
Does judicial review give nine justices too much power?
No, because say the fate of a bill that might become a law is if it is constitutional or not. It is important that the nine justices have the power to declare if the bill about to be made a law ins unconstitutional.
Palindromes- which might justify an attack on the government?
Dam mit I'm mad
Is naming a verb?
no... in some circumstances it might be
How might Marbury v. Madison ruling affect future actions by congress?
The Marbury v. Madison ruling cemented the idea of checks and balances by establishing the idea of judicial review. This allowed for the Supreme Court to interpret and declare laws unconstitutional as they saw fit.
What is quasi- judicial?
quasi-judicial behaviour is action taken which mimics the role of a court. For example, a government minister might take decisions on planning appeals
What is quasi-judicial behavior?
quasi-judicial behaviour is action taken which mimics the role of a court. For example, a government minister might take decisions on planning appeals
