Evidence that is relevant and reliable tends to make a fact in question more or less probable. This includes direct evidence, such as eyewitness testimony or physical evidence, which can strongly support or contradict a claim. Circumstantial evidence, while less direct, can also influence probability by suggesting connections or implications related to the fact in question. Ultimately, the strength and credibility of the evidence determine its impact on the likelihood of the fact being true.
There is no answer to this question. The answer tends to infinity.
According to subjective, testimonial evidence, it tends to have little or no odor.
im not sure but the answer to this question is protein.
because it belongs in group 6 of the periodic table. To be able to have a full outer shell of 8, it will accept 2 electrons
This Question is fractured in thinking, not clearly directed as to purpose and meaning and tends to be divisive. A duplicate question.
No. And one tends to doubt the sincerity of such a question.
Evidence is information that supports a claim, proposition, or conclusion. It can come in various forms, such as facts, data, testimonies, or physical objects, and is used to establish the truth or validity of an argument or hypothesis.
We have not - very probable- data for the mechanical properties of polonium.
Dan Brown's political beliefs are not widely known, as he tends to keep his personal views private. He is known for his works of fiction, particularly his novels like "The Da Vinci Code." It's best not to make assumptions about his political leaning without direct evidence.
Exculpatory evidence is important in a criminal trial because it can help prove a defendant's innocence or show that they are not guilty of the crime they are accused of. This type of evidence can include alibis, witness statements, or forensic evidence that supports the defendant's version of events. In contrast, inculpatory evidence is evidence that tends to show the defendant's guilt or involvement in the crime. It is crucial for both types of evidence to be presented in a fair and balanced way to ensure a just outcome in the trial.
Corroborating evidence (in "corroboration") is evidence that tends to support a proposition that is already supported by some initial evidence, therefore confirming the proposition. For example, W, a witness, testifies that she saw X drive his automobile into a green car. Meanwhile Y, another witness, testifies that when he examined X's car, later that day, he noticed green paint on its fender
No. They were married until his death. Actually the evidence tends to suggest that there was no estrangement between them although they lived in different places for most of their married life.