Specific intent (also known as dolus specialis) is an intent (mens rea) which goes beyond the constituant (physical) elements of the crime (the actus reus). For example genocide is considered to be an offence of specific intent; for a person to be found responsible for genocide they must not only commit on of the constituant acts (eg. extermination) but they must do so with the specific intent to destroy in whole or in part the victimised group. This differs from the intent required for most crimes eg. assault where there is a mens rea (intent) requirement but the intent required relates solely to performing the physical acts (actus reus) involved. Crimes of specific intent cannot be commited recklessly and in some jurisdictions cannot be committed while intoxicated.
What happened in Chernobyl was an accident, and therefore cannot be qualified as genocide since there was no intent to systemically destroy (or kill, eradicate, et cetera) the people in Chernobyl.
You have to be more specific about which genocide you are referring to, as there has been dozens of genocide over the years.
No, the Holocaust is the name of one specific attempted genocide.
genocide
Because hitler tried to destroy the jewish.
Yes, it is legal to destroy money that you own, but it is illegal to deface or destroy money with the intent to render it unfit for circulation.
General intent does not require an intentional unlawful action but only that a wrongful act was commtitted. Specific intent requires intentional unlawful action
Humanity will always try to destroy each other.
You need to be specific as there nothing commonly known as 'the Russian genocide'.
"The Holocaust" was the name given to the Jewish genocide after the fact. The Rwandan genocide does not have a specific name, but they are both genocides.
When the fire is intentionally set with a criminal intent to destroy.