In this case Lipman agreed to sell land to Jones but before completion of the contract sold the land to a company of which he and another were the sole directors and shareholders. The judges ordered specific performance against Lipman and the company. The company was described as a device and a sham, a mask which Lipman held before his face in an attempt to avoid recognition by the eye of equity.
The Jones v Lipman case is a classic example of lifting the veil of incorporation, that the company was used to evade legal obligation or commit fraud.
The defendant of the case would Jones.
The defendant of the case would Jones.
Maureen Lipman Live and Kidding - 1996 V is rated/received certificates of: UK:PG
A criminal case
In the case title "Jones v. Smith," Jones is the appellant (the party appealing the case), while Smith is the appellee (the party responding to the appeal). This notation signifies that Jones is challenging a decision made by a lower court in favor of Smith. The "v." stands for "versus," indicating the opposing sides in the legal dispute.
Case Citation:Baker v. Carr, 369 US 186 (1962)
that all ballsacks are to be round
The case of Michigan vs Christopher Jones is often used in law schools as a precedent in which prosecuting attorneys pressure defendants to plead guilty by charging them with multiple offenses.
Herschel V. Jones was born in 1861.
Herschel V. Jones died in 1928.
Kenneth V. Jones was born in 1924.
V. M. Jones was born in 1958.