answersLogoWhite

0

The Federalists thought the existing laws would be enough to protect individual rights and the B of R was not necessary.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Why was the Bill of Rights added?

The Bill of Rights (Ten Amendments) were adopted because the states were promised a Bill of Rights. This was during the Ratification (approval) of the Constitution. Anti-federalists did not support the Constitution and did not Ratify it. Federalists ratified it because of their own points of view. they believed a Constitution was a good sense of power, while Anti-federalists wanted a Bill of Rights, belived that the Constitution would give the Central government too much power in the expense of the state governments. Congress did not want to destroy harmony among the states because they had promised the Anti-federalists a bill of rights. The Bill of rights was added to the Constitution in 1791 in Deleware.


What was the difference between the Federalist view and the Anti federalist view of government?

the Federalist were all for the constitution and the anti-federalist were against it because they thought it needed a bill of rights to protect individual rights!


What was the anti-federalists point of view about the ratification of the Constitution?

The Anti-Federalists opposed the ratification of the Constitution primarily because they feared that it would create a strong central government that could threaten individual liberties and state sovereignty. They argued that the Constitution lacked a Bill of Rights to protect citizens' freedoms and that the proposed government structure favored the elite over the common people. Anti-Federalists believed that a more decentralized system, which preserved greater power for the states, was essential to safeguard democracy and prevent tyranny. Their concerns ultimately led to the adoption of the Bill of Rights as a compromise to ensure protection of individual freedoms.


What is one of the reasons for the addition of the bill of rights to the constitution?

It was to stop others to believe in won thing from one persons point of view. Hope it is right!


Has any of the amendments in the bill of rights been violated?

Yes. And when that happens, courts take a dim view of it, usually in favor of a defendant whose rights have been violated, even to the point of dismissing charges.


What group of Framers wanted a Bill of Rights in the US Constitution?

The origins of the Bill of Rights started during the debate over the ratification of the newly-written Constitution. The Federalists, under James Madison, Alexander Hamilton and John Jay supported a strong federal government, supporting the views that a powerful central government was necessary to keep a country together. The opposite view, the fear of a central government becoming too powerful, was championed by Thomas Jefferson and Patrick Henry. The Federalists backed up the Constitution because it upheld a strong federal government over state governments while the Anti-Federalists strongly opposed this in favor of states' rights. To encourage ratification, Madison, Hamilton and Jay wrote the Federalist Papers outlining their views on the idea of a strong central government. Eventually, the Federalists won out and the Constitution was ratified, but only after the Federalists provided certain provisions that protected individual freedoms and state sovereignty. The Bill of Rights are collectively the first ten amendments of the Constitution, a reassurance to the state-rightists in the guarantee of individual freedoms, the limit of government power and the reservation of power to the states and public. As an aside, Madison presented 12 "rights" that were rejected by the convention.


What was the difference between the federalists view and the anti federalist view on government?

Federalists advocated for a strong central government, believing it was necessary to maintain order and unity, and they supported the ratification of the Constitution. They argued that a robust national government would better manage economic issues and protect individual rights. In contrast, Anti-Federalists favored stronger state governments and feared that a powerful central government would threaten individual liberties and lead to tyranny. They sought more safeguards for personal freedoms and were concerned that the Constitution lacked a Bill of Rights to protect citizens from potential government overreach.


What was Whitmans view of the Bill of Rights probably was?

it was good to protect the freedom of individuals


How did Thomas Jefferson outfederalize the federalists?

He agreed to the Louisiana Purchase through loose interpretation of the Constitution, which was actually a characteristic of the Federalists, not the Republicans. The Louisiana Purchase also diminished the power of state governments, which was against the Republican view of state's rights.


What is science view point on animal rights?

Science has nothing to do with rights with respect to the law. What is the purpose for asking the question?


What do you think Whitman's view of the Bill of Rights probably was?

it was good to protect the freedom of individules


What did federalists view of Jefferson?

he was the head of the opposite party, the democratic republicans. Thus, his opinions were the oposite of that of the federalists.