0
To provide an accurate response, I would need more context regarding the specific case involving "her resch." Judges typically base their rulings on legal precedents, evidentiary standards, and the application of relevant laws. Common reasons for ruling against a party may include insufficient evidence, failure to meet legal criteria, or procedural issues. If you provide more details about the case, I can give a more precise answer.
What else can I help you with?
Can a judge who has handled a pfa case judge you on a criminal case?
Yes, judges rule on an impartial basis. If you suspect that the judge may be biased against you you can submit a motion for a new judge, or a change of venue.
Difference between inductive and deductive reasoning?
inductive reasoning is self propagation and self establishedinductive reasoning starts with empirical observations of specific phenomena, then establishes a general rule to fit the observed facts.deductive reasoning starts with a general rule, then applies that rule to a specific instance.
What is the importance of case citing?
if your case is directly related to another case then a "case citing" is extremely important, especially if it was the same judge, a judge will not rule against himself so if he has ruled one way before he'll rule the same this time.
When objection is raised regarding ex post facto application what is correct verbiage for overruling?
There is no rote response. The judge may rule using whatever language, legal reasoning, or cites that they choose.
What do you do when a creditor in bankruptcy files an adversary proceeding?
An adversary is just a lawsuit. If you don't want the judge to rule against you you need to file an answer.
Information against the accused that cannot be used?
It is evidence that has been ruled "INADMISSABLE" by the trial judge. One is tempted to answer this question with "hearsay" evidence. HOWEVER - that would be wrong. There are so many exceptions to the hearsay rule that the only way the admissability of hearsay can be determined is by submitting it to the trial judge and having the judge rule on it. It is entirely possible that, due to the legal cirecumstances of the case, hearsay evidence could be included. However, if the judge rules against it, it becomes "inadmissable." THUS - information that cannot be used against the accused is called "inadmissable evidence."
How did federal court rule in the Microsoft anti-trust case of 2000?
In 2000, in an antitrust lawsuit brought against Microsoft, a U.S. federal court judge ruled against the company.
What have political philosopher determined is one reason people accept certain forms of rule and not others?
Political philosophers have determined that reasoning or rationalism is one reason people accept certain forms of rules and not others. People need to use their logic to judge if a rule is rational.
Does Deductive reasoning involves developing a general rule from specific situations?
No
Can a judge speak to a minor in a custody battle?
Yes. The judge may speak with the child but is under no obligation to rule according to the child's preferences.Yes. The judge may speak with the child but is under no obligation to rule according to the child's preferences.Yes. The judge may speak with the child but is under no obligation to rule according to the child's preferences.Yes. The judge may speak with the child but is under no obligation to rule according to the child's preferences.
Does inductive reasoning involve applying a general rule to a specific situation?
No, inductive reasoning involves reaching a general conclusion based on specific observations or evidence. It moves from specific instances to a general principle, unlike deductive reasoning which applies a general rule to specific situations.
A general rule used to explain a specific event is called?
A.deductive reasoning
