What was the rule of law in clark v wambold?

Answer 1

In Clark v. Wambold, the rule of law established that a party cannot recover damages for emotional distress without a physical injury unless the conduct is particularly outrageous or extreme. The court emphasized the necessity of a clear standard for determining when emotional distress claims are valid, seeking to limit liability for such claims. This case highlighted the need for a balance between allowing recovery for genuine emotional harm and preventing frivolous lawsuits.