well the social concequnces is that people lost a lot of trust in cooperate America and I think this brought about a stronger feeling that the CEOs are only interested in their paychecks and would gladly sacrifice the company for a quick buck. Thus the main concequence was the lost trust.
Economically, lots of people lost a lot of their money or savings, putting them in an insecure economic situation as well as putting a question mark on their future (many people had their life long savings invested in Enron and lost it all), Other than that, it also detered people from investing in big companies for awhile(needs conformation) due to the lost of trust. The stock markets also got nervous for awhile. Companies such as Arther Anderson amongst others who had business dealings with enron also got effected, thus people who never even worked for Enron became victims of the fallout.
I'm not sure of the specific steps that were taken, but accounting practices came under more scrutiny and regulations got tighter. People also became more aware and more cautious about investing.
Enron was said to have committed fraud in an accounting scandal. Refer to the link below, for more information.
Manifestations of corruption can include bribery, embezzlement, nepotism, kickbacks, cronyism, and fraud. These practices undermine transparency, accountability, and fairness, and can have serious economic, social, and political consequences.
Land fraud refers to illegal activities involving the deceitful acquisition, sale, or ownership of land. This can include schemes such as falsifying documents, misrepresenting property boundaries, or selling land that does not exist. Victims of land fraud often face financial losses and legal complications as they navigate the aftermath of the deception. It undermines trust in real estate transactions and can lead to significant economic and social consequences.
White-collar crime
ultimately paid the Securities and Exchange Commission a fine of $135 million for contributing to the Enron fraud. As of 2004 the bank faced civil suits for causing unclear damages in financing the company.
It would be deductible as a casualty loss. However, you really need to qualify it as fraud...not just believe it is or it's obvious. For example, many people, both employees and investors in Enron stock, tried to take it as a casualty loss (instead of a capital one), for the tax benefit, but that position was rejected each time by the IRS. And Enron is a fairly clear instance of fraud to many....but the case was never proven or prosecuted legally as that.
Enron
No. Father and son. Son was acquitted on all counts.
It would be deductible as a casualty loss. However, you really need to qualify it as fraud...not just believe it is or it's obvious. For example, many people, both employees and investors in Enron stock, tried to take many different losses as a casualty loss (instead of a capital one), for the tax benefit. But that position was rejected each time by the IRS. And Enron to some is a fairly clear instance of fraud....but even with the proof of accounting deceptions, as the case was never proven or prosecuted legally as fraud....it wasn't allowed as that.
Simi Kedia has written: 'The economics of fraudulent accounting' -- subject- s -: Accounting fraud, Economic aspects, Economic aspects of Accounting fraud
Several top executives were arrested for their roles in the Enron scandal, most notably CEO Jeffrey Skilling and Chairman Kenneth Lay. They faced charges related to fraud, conspiracy, and insider trading in connection with the company's collapse in 2001. Additionally, CFO Andrew Fastow was also arrested and later pleaded guilty to charges of fraud and conspiracy. The scandal ultimately led to significant regulatory changes in the corporate world, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
The Enron Corporation which Fortune Magazine had called "Ameriica's most inovative Company" for six consecutive years before the fraud was diiscovered.