Proponents of the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) argued that it would provide clear constitutional protections against gender discrimination, ensuring that women and men have equal rights under the law. Supporters believed the ERA would strengthen existing legal frameworks and reinforce gender equality in areas such as employment, education, and reproductive rights. Additionally, they contended that it would help change societal attitudes towards women, promoting a more equitable and just society. Overall, the ERA was seen as a necessary step toward achieving full equality for all genders.
adopting the constitution
I do no know this answer because i do not care
chucky schumer, nancy pelosi
The key to all arguments is having logical information and facts. This will make it easier to present your case in opposition or in favor of the argument.
that a virgin couldn't get pregnant, because she was a virgin
Pros could be professionals, or they could be arguments in favor of something (as opposed to cons).
morale and propaganda.
Admiral Mahan's arguments were that our growing production needs this, we need ways to respond quickly, and that we need to be closer. :)
The right to use pornography.
The civil rights act was not in 1988, but 1965.
That is a debatable issue. There are economic arguments in favor of drilling for oil in protected areas, and environmental arguments against such drilling. My personal sympathies lie with the environmental arguments.
Experts say Justice Thomas is not particularly receptive to arguments in favor of same-sex marriage.