If nobles committed a crime in historical contexts, they often faced different consequences compared to commoners, due to their social status and privileges. In many cases, they could evade severe punishment through legal loopholes or influence, possibly facing only minor penalties or being tried in a more favorable court. However, if the crime was particularly egregious or politically sensitive, they could be stripped of their titles, face exile, or even execution, depending on the laws and customs of the time. The response to their crime also often reflected the balance of power and the political climate of the era.
Hes screwed
Fur Collar crime was crime committed by nobility. It's similar to what we call white-collar crime now. One common type of Fur collar crime was to capture higher nobles and ransom them back to their kingdoms. It occurred because nobles wanted to increase their own power and wealth through the ransom money. Also Fur-Collar crime was often unpunished since most of the criminals would capture distant nobles making it cheaper to pay the ransom than to take the nobles back by force in the 14th and 15th centuries.
No But The Nobles would be cast into exile for a serious crime
Property crime would be the most common crime committed in Mexico. It would include burglary, larceny, theft, motor vehicle theft, arson, shoplifting, and vandalism.
Delinquent act
He or she would be charged with the crime and tried, just as he/she would otherwise.
they would be excuted along with their whole family
YES you can ! You are 'aiding and abetting' a KNOWN criminal. You would be treated as if you had also committed the crime.
yes you can get triedthink about it this way if someone came to America and committed a crime they would be tried here unless they have diplomatic immunity.
The person would be tried and punished where they committed the crime. It is part of our justice system to be tried by a jury of our peers, and our peers live in our own neighborhood. So if the person is caught elsewhere, he is returned to the jurisdiction where he committed the crime to be tried. This is why the process of extradition is in place.
yes, a crime is still a crime, it doesnt matter when it was commited
They would have all the people who came into jail and what crime they committed and where it happened.