This is a question that cannot be answered with a definitive response. It is, instead, a springboard for discussion, argument, and debate more suited to a blog or chatroom than it is to a an ANSWERS website.
If the criteria for taking a case were more stringent, fewer cases would be accepted for representation, potentially limiting access to justice for some individuals. On the other hand, if the criteria were less stringent, more cases would be accepted, potentially overwhelming the system and impacting the quality of representation due to limited resources. Balancing the criteria is essential to ensure fairness and efficiency in the legal system.
In extreme cases and with certain vitamins this can happen.
Yes, you can bond out if you get a federal indictment, but the process and requirements for obtaining bail in federal cases can be more stringent than in state cases.
Entry criteria specified when to start testing. some of the entry criteria is as below - Coding is complete and unit tested - Test Cases are written, peer reviewed and signed off
Entry criteria specified when to start testing. some of the entry criteria is as below - Coding is complete and unit tested - Test Cases are written, peer reviewed and signed off
The criteria for judging a solo singing contest varies from contest to contest. In most cases the most important qualification for a judge is impartiality.
formal justice
Formal justice
The cases just happened in human resource - you can't be serious...
In most cases, yes.
that won't happen in practical life but in some exceptional cases to happen
Becoming unconscious is one of the criteria for OSHA recordability, so yes, in most cases, and all other criteria for recordability being met, this would be a recordable event.