No. Criminal libel, and slander, is not lawful and not tolerated (certainly not by those libeled). The publication you refer to, and the content you believe may be libelous, has quite likely already met the test of lawfulness.
added: Encyclopedia Dramatica is not a real encyclopedia, rather a website devoted to satire. However, the majority of the articles satirizing actual people are done strictly as to persecute the subject, usually because the original author holds a grudge against the person being satirized. The owners of the website do not care what is said, as long as an attempt at humor is made. Any attempts to get articles removed are met with derision and scorn, since the owners actually encourage libelous behavior. The content of Encyclopedia Dramatica has not met the test of lawfulness. It's lawfulness hasn't been tested at all.
See Discussion Page:
How do you define the word Libel
If your implication of the story was to hurt, and you know it was to hurt, then yes it could be libelous, would u be prosecuted if there is no names? probably not. But, guilt trip!
Perry Mason - 1957 The Case of the Libelous Locket 6-17 was released on: USA: 7 February 1963
Although it is a separate legal term, a synonym is "libelous". Also, "derogatory", "disparaging", and "invidious".
He is most definately not, accusations such as this are very damaging, and libelous.
Yes, a post on Facebook is accessable to millions of viewers.
Other than accusing, related words could be impugning or derogatory, and if the accusations are false, you can use libelous.
Any statements that are deemed Libelous under the law. Of course yelling 'fire' in a theatre has been ruled not protected speech.
Individuals can avoid engaging in libelous behavior and potential legal consequences by ensuring that any statements they make about others are true, not malicious, and based on facts. It is important to verify information before sharing it publicly and to avoid making false or defamatory statements about others. Additionally, seeking legal advice before publishing potentially harmful information can help individuals understand their rights and responsibilities.
A primary liability is discussed when the libelous action finds you at fault as the caregiver. A vicarious liability is the liability shared with another in a supervisory role.
As long as it is not slanderous or libelous it is permissible. However, making such commentary would not be considered "illegal" it would be considered a tort or civil matter, at most.
Sid Bream is a devoted Christian, married and straight. He is the father of three sons and an adopted daughter. For anyone to suggest that he is gay is criminally libelous. I know him personally and can vouch for this answer. Grow up.