The Commerce Clause can apply to a business that only does business in one state.
Commerce Clause
BIERING!
BIERING!
They cannot Print money, wage wars, or regulate commerce. The state can issue licenses and regulate commerce only within state borders.There is very significant intrusion of the federal government in the regulation of what is in practice intra-State commerce, due to the Dormant Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution ("the negative implications of the Commerce Clause").The American state (the American nation or the entirety of the United States) is not the same as an American Stateor U.S. State, of which there are currently fifty of these co-sovereigns.
commerce clause
commerce clause
Front Page with Allen Barton - 2009 Can the Commerce Clause Stop ObamaCare Or Will It Enable the Socialist State was released on: USA: 17 December 2010
In American law, the inherent clause allows each state to have the full authority to govern its domestic commerce.
The framers added the commerce clause to the Constitution because it prevents states from passing their own trade laws.
Yes because ,The statute does not violate the Commerce Clause as constituting an unreasonable burden on interstate commerce The statute does not discriminate between interstate and intrastate commerce but regulates evenhandedly by prohibiting all milk retailers from selling their products in plastic containers, without regard to whether the milk, the containers, or the sellers are from outside the State The incidental burden imposed on interstate commerce by the statute is not excessive in relation to the putative local benefits. Milk products may continue to move freely across the Minnesota border, and since most dairies package their products in more than one type of container, the inconvenience of having to conform to different packaging requirements in Minnesota and the surrounding States should be slight. Even granting that the out-of-state plastics industry is burdened relatively more heavily than the Minnesota pulpwood industry, this burden is not "clearly excessive" in light of the substantial state interest in promoting conservation of energy and other natural resources and easing solid waste disposal problems. These local benefits amply support Minnesota's decision under the Commerce Clause.
Alaska's law violated the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution, which grants Congress the power to regulate interstate commerce. By favoring state residents over nonresidents in job opportunities, the law discriminated against out-of-state workers and interfered with the free flow of interstate commerce.