0
What else can I help you with?
If you signed a federal signature bond and the defendant absconds Can the feds take your home?
They may sieze whatever it is that you put up as the 'bond' to ensure the defendants appearance. If it was your house that you put at risk, and if the defendant abasconded and is now a fugitive, yes, they can. Unless this is a theoretical question, you need the advice of an attorney right away.
Which type of defense is used when a defense attorney claims that the defendants actions were necessary to ensure his safety?
The question is unclear but you may be describing a "Self-Defense" defense.
If 2 defendants and one settles whose name should be in the caption of the hold harmless agreement the one settling or the remaining defendant or both against whom the med mal. suit was brought?
This is a DUPLICATE question than cannot me merged. so I am trashing it in favor of the other question.
If 2 defendants and one settles whose name should be in the caption of the hold harmless agreement the one settling or the remaining defendant or both against whom the suit was brought?
If I understand the question correctly - the one who settled will appear in the "hiold blameless" category.
If a defendant refuses to testify at trial what can the prosecution tell the jury?
Your question is unclear. In the USA, a defendant does NOT HAVE TO testify at his trial, ever. The defendant is the one accused of committing the crime. He does not have to say anything (OJ Simpson did NOT testify in his first trial, Scott Peterson did NOT testify at his trial.) The Prosecutor will present his case (with all his evidence and witnesses) explaining to the jury (or judge) WHY the evidence shows the defendant committed the crime. The Defense Attorney will present his case (with all his evidence and witnesses) explaining to the jury (or judge) WHY the evidence does NOT show the defendant committed the crime. The defendant does not have to be one of those witnesses. He cannot be forced to testify.
If you go to court what do you do?
If you are a defendant you defend yourself, if you are the complainant you prove your case (against a defendant). This question is otherwise to ambiguous to answer correctly.
Why should pretrial services be provided for defendants?
I'll agree that defendants DO have rights prior to, and during, their trial in order to protect a possibly innocent person from being wrongfully convicted. However, unless the question refers to their right of appeal, I am unaware of any "rights" which a convicted defendant possesses after conviction, except protection from "cruel and unusual punishment."
What was the legal question of Powell vs Alabama?
Were the defendants in this case denied their constitutional rights to counsel and due process?
Can an attorney who represented a defendant prosecute a probation revocation hearing of the same defendant?
Something is not right with this question. Did the defense attorney suddenly go to work for the prosecutor's office?
What to do when prosecutor tampering with the defendant not guilty plea?
Don't understand what is meant by the question. THAT's what prosecutors DO! Their job is to attempt to prove that the defendant IS guilty, and that his not guilty plea is a lie.
If Javier sued Energy-Auto Inc identify who would be the plaintiff and the defendant?
Answer this question...If Javier sued Energy-Auto Inc., identify who would be the plaintiff and the defendant
What specific actions did the defendant take at the time of the incident in question?
The defendant was seen entering the store, taking items off the shelves, and attempting to leave without paying for them.
