0
What else can I help you with?
Do federal judges make new laws to replace bad ones?
judges do not make laws.. they only interpret them and give their ruling accordingly
Should Federal Judges only interpret existing laws or should they be able to create new laws?
No, federal judges should not be able to create new laws since that's the job of the legislature. Judges should only interpret existing laws instead of trying to write them.
In the words of Justice Felix Frankfurter what does legislatures make law whoe sales judges retail mean?
This quote emphasizes the distinction between the roles of legislatures and judges in the legal system. Legislatures create general laws that apply broadly to society, while judges interpret and apply those laws to specific cases, like a retail store selling goods to individuals. It underscores the idea that judges should not create new laws, but rather interpret and apply existing laws.
Do judges have the right to change the law?
Judges do not have the right to change the law. Although a new rule could be made from a different interpretation of already-existing laws, the judge cannot change pre-existing laws.
Did the Pilgrims make new laws?
no
How does the German government make new laws?
Laws have to be passed by the Bundestag.
What is the job of housing?
To make new laws.
What is a job description for a senator?
-Proposes and votes on new national laws.-As a U.S. Senator, votes on confirming federal judges and U.S.Supreme Court Justices.
The three branches of government are the __________ branch, the ____________ branch, and the _______________ branch.?
legislative branch- proposes new laws, can impeach president Executive- carry out the laws, hold the president who is the commander in chief, and can veto laws appoint and fire judges etc Judicial- implements and enforces the laws
Who make laws for New Jersey?
The State Legislature.
What is the House of Commons job?
To make new laws.
Do judges make law in common law countries?
Common Law is made by judges particularly in areas of torts and contracts. Marbury vs. Madison is a famous case in which the U.S. Supreme Court decided that it had a right to review and strike down laws made by Congress even though nothing in the U.S. Constitution gave the court that power. Jury decisions do not set legal precedent.
