Judges don't make laws, governments legislatures do.
judges do not make laws.. they only interpret them and give their ruling accordingly
No, federal judges should not be able to create new laws since that's the job of the legislature. Judges should only interpret existing laws instead of trying to write them.
This quote emphasizes the distinction between the roles of legislatures and judges in the legal system. Legislatures create general laws that apply broadly to society, while judges interpret and apply those laws to specific cases, like a retail store selling goods to individuals. It underscores the idea that judges should not create new laws, but rather interpret and apply existing laws.
Judges do not have the right to change the law. Although a new rule could be made from a different interpretation of already-existing laws, the judge cannot change pre-existing laws.
no
Laws have to be passed by the Bundestag.
To make new laws.
-Proposes and votes on new national laws.-As a U.S. Senator, votes on confirming federal judges and U.S.Supreme Court Justices.
legislative branch- proposes new laws, can impeach president Executive- carry out the laws, hold the president who is the commander in chief, and can veto laws appoint and fire judges etc Judicial- implements and enforces the laws
The State Legislature.
To make new laws.
Common Law is made by judges particularly in areas of torts and contracts. Marbury vs. Madison is a famous case in which the U.S. Supreme Court decided that it had a right to review and strike down laws made by Congress even though nothing in the U.S. Constitution gave the court that power. Jury decisions do not set legal precedent.