US-Cert
how the victim feels about the crime.
It depends what her statement now is. It also depends on what the DA decides to do, whether he or she thinks that he or she would be able to competently prosecute the crime without a complaining witness (if the victim's current statement is that the crime did not occur) or, if the victim's current statement is that the crime did occur, it would severely weaken the prosecution's case.
They are required to 'treat' them. It would be the attending physicians decision as to whether or not the alleged victim actually needed to be admitted for inpatient treatment, or not.
It depends on the type of crime and whether I feel that someone is endangered by the criminal. I report drunk drivers whenever possible, as well as reckless driving.
I would encourage the victim to report it and then would go with them to report it to the appropriate authority. I would make certain a record is made of the report and there is follow-up.
No, not unless it was the victim themselves who reported it. In that case you would certainly know who it was.
Gmail: Put a checkmark next to the email you would like to report, then click on the "report spam" button.Hotmail: Put a checkmark on the email you would like to report, click on the drop-down menu that says "Mark As", then in the drop-down menu select "Phishing Scam".Yahoo Mail: Put a checkmark on the email you would like to report, click up at top where it says "Spam".Note: These are all using the web-clients, other web clients and offline clients might have similar features that allow you to put a checkmark and report as spam or phishing scam.
Victims precipitate 0% of all homicides. The decision to commit the crime is still made by the perpetrator and always precipitated by that person. No matter how dumb, naive, careless, greedy, or even guilty of a crime the victim may be, the person who decides to commit the crime against them is still the perpetrator and the person who was subject to the crime is still the victim. The percentage of occurrence that the perpetrator is the only victim of their own crime is negligible, and that person is still the perpetrator.
The NCVS gathers information by surveying people who were victims of a crime. Homicide means murder. Anybody who was the victim in a murder would not be able to take the survey because they are dead.
Not reporting a crime could be a form of an omission (which is a failure to act)It depends on the crime itself, and if there are any laws requiring someone to report a crime.For example (in english law), the road traffic act 1988 requires a person to report a road accident, and failure to do so would be an omission and therefore a crime.Unfortunately I cannot be specific to this question, as the crime exactly has not been defined. But yes, criminal liability is possible when failing to report a crime.
If it does, I would report it as a hate crime.
Crime statistics only include recorded crimes. A lot of crimes go unreported and therefore unrecorded, for various reasons, mainly leading back to the fact that the victim doesn't always report the crime. There is actually much, much more crime happening than we think, because we look at the official crime statistics and it only shows a certain amount, and the crimes commited by certain people. Sociologists explain reasons for this. For example; The official crime statistics show that males are most likely to commit crime against other males. A sociologist would say that this is because men want to live up to the 'macho image', they don't want to admit defeat. If a woman commited a crime against the man, he may be very unlikely to report it. So; a lot of crime commited by women against men goes unrecorded and doesn't appear in the official statistics.