0
What else can I help you with?
Who is competent to amend the fundamental rights?
supreme court
What can you do when government interfere in your fundamental rights?
for this we can move on to the court
In The Indian constitution what is the enacted in the articles 32-35 A?
Articles 32 to 35 of the Indian Constitution deal with the protection of fundamental rights. Article 32 provides the right to constitutional remedies, allowing individuals to approach the Supreme Court for enforcement of their fundamental rights. Article 33 permits Parliament to restrict or abrogate the rights of armed forces and forces employed in the maintenance of public order. Articles 34 and 35 outline the authority of Parliament to legislate on matters related to the fundamental rights of citizens, specifically in relation to the rights of certain groups and the enforcement of laws.
What has the author J B Oyeleye written?
J. B. Oyeleye has written: 'Federal High Court (civil procedure rules) 1999' -- subject(s): Civil procedure, Court rules 'The fundamental rights (enforcement procedure) rules, 1979' -- subject(s): Civil rights, Civil procedure, Court rules
What is the meaning of law enforcement?
it means that the court will help you to get your rights in the contract
Difference between fundamental rights and ordinary rights?
When ter s violation of fundamental rights v can directly go to supreme court.. Whereas in second case v can't appeal to supreme court directly.. moreover, the ordinary rights are granted by the ordinary laws. they do not have the same sanctions and sanctity as the fundamental rights have because the latter is guaranteed by the constitution itself. the fundamental rights are incorporated in the constitution.
What safe guards have been provided in the constitution against the violation of Fundamental Rights?
in case,a fundamental right is violated,one can move to the court of law and can seek justice.This means that our fundamental rights are not absolute or unlimited.
Who is the protectar of fundamental right?
supreme cort is the protector of funda mental rights.
Why are Fundamental Rights different from Directive Principles?
There exist many differences. The most important being that the fundamental rights can be enforced by a court of law (against the state), while Directive Principles are not. Fundamental rights are inalienabe rights, whereas Directive Principles are aimed at securing welfare, which are more like constitutional guidelines.
What has the author Shariful Hasan written?
Shariful Hasan has written: 'Supreme Court, fundamental rights and directive principles' -- subject(s): Civil rights, India, India. Supreme Court
What has the author Akhileshwar Sharma written?
Akhileshwar Sharma has written: 'The Supreme Court of India, as the guardian of fundamental rights' -- subject(s): Civil rights, India, India. Supreme Court
Difference between directive principles of state policy and the fundamental rights?
Fundamental rights are justiciable where as directive principles are not justiciable. The provision of directive priciple thus cannot be enforced in court of law.
