In USA the Supreme court judges decide as to whether certain laws are constitutional or not.
eg.In the Brown vs Board of education of TOPEKA 1954 case the supreme court ruled that the " separate but equal" doctrine was unconstitutional
Who can declare laws unconstitutional
The justices of the US Supreme Court, provided a state law conflicting with the federal Constitution is part of an appeal before the Court.
They are called "unconstitutional laws".
The term null and void means that a state deems a law unconstitutional and chooses not to follow it.
No. The police enforce the laws. The court decides whether someone is guilty or not.
They can appeal to the United States Supreme Court to have the law be declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court's right to judicial review.
The Legislative Branch sometimes passes unconstitutional laws, but they're not supposed to. None of the branches is authorized to create unconstitutional laws.
Congress cannot declare laws unconstitutional. The Judiciary Branch may declare a law unconstitutional only if it conflicts with some provision of the State or Federal Constitution. The Supreme Court can rule a law to be unconstitutional, but Congress, along with the States, can only amend the Constitution.
in considering the scores of challenges to those state laws, the supreme court found the mandatory death penalty laws unconstitutional, though the 2 stage approach was seen to be constitutional.
The judicial branch, specifically the Supreme Court, can declare laws unconstitutional.
unless the state law is declared unconstitutional the answer is yes.
The term null and void means that a state deems a law unconstitutional and chooses not to follow it.