The least likely terrorist target is typically a remote, rural area with minimal symbolic or strategic value, such as a small farming community. Such locations lack the media attention and potential for mass casualties that urban centers or high-profile landmarks provide. Additionally, the absence of significant infrastructure or a large population makes them less appealing for terrorist organizations.
The North Pacific, hundreds of miles from any piece of land, is probably the least likely target for terrorists considering that there are no people, no important military positions, no witnesses, no recording devices, and no interest. Terrorists feed off of the fear and carnage generated in order to propagate their message.
The least likely terrorist target typically includes locations with minimal symbolic value or low visibility, such as rural areas or small, low-profile businesses. These targets do not attract significant media attention or public impact compared to high-profile locations like government buildings or major infrastructure. Additionally, areas with strong security measures and low public interest are less appealing to terrorists. Therefore, targets that lack symbolic significance or are well-protected are deemed less likely to be attacked.
No. Libraries are not a high priority target because large numbers of people do not gather in libraries nor do libraries have important economic value.
Using pressure tactics is least likely to result in target commitment, as the target may feel coerced or manipulated into agreeing. This can lead to resentment and lack of genuine buy-in from the target. Building a trusting relationship and using persuasion tactics are more likely to result in target commitment.
flight 93
FPCON Delta
Al-Qaeda
populated areas.
It is more than likely.
Al-Qaeda
The first target was the hijacking of American Airlines Flight 11. The North Tower of the World Trade Center was the first ground target hit.
too much of a terrorist target