0
What else can I help you with?
How often can the constitution be modified?
As often as Constitutional Amendments are proposed.
What are the bills of rights often referred to?
the first 10 amendments to the constitution
What method was most often used to start the process of amending the U.S Constitution?
The most common method used to start the process of amending the U.S. Constitution is through a two-thirds vote in both houses of Congress, the Senate and the House of Representatives. This method has been employed for the vast majority of amendments ratified since the Constitution's adoption. Alternatively, a constitutional convention can be called by two-thirds of state legislatures, but this method has never been used.
How are amendments to a state constitution approved?
It depends on the state, but often they are ratified through legislature or propositions.
How often is the constitution is review in Florida?
In Florida, the state constitution is reviewed every 20 years by the Constitution Revision Commission, which is convened to propose amendments. Additionally, any citizen can propose amendments through a petition process, and the Florida Legislature can also initiate amendments. This structured review process ensures that the constitution remains relevant to the state's needs over time.
What do most amendments to the constitution proposed by congress do?
The amendments change the constitution, either adding new rules or changing old ones. In the US Constitution, the first 10 amendments (the Bill of Rights) essentially prevented the new federal government from usurping the basic rights that the country was founded to provide.
How many amendments does the Michigan constitution have?
it has 17 amendments including 2 8-A so don't call it 19
How many states are needed to call a convention?
Forty-nine states have applied for an Article V Convention (what is often called a "Constitutional Convention"), submitting more 700 applications. Article V does not permit the calling of a "constitutional convention" only a "convention for proposing amendments."
How many years does a state have to ratify an amendments?
There is no specific time limit set by the U.S. Constitution for a state to ratify an amendment; however, Congress often establishes a deadline when proposing an amendment. For example, the Equal Rights Amendment included a seven-year ratification deadline. Ultimately, the timeframe can vary depending on the amendment and the stipulations set during its proposal.
What is needed to ratify an amendment?
Amendments to the US Constitution are ratified by the states, and by the states alone. The federal government itself does not have a say at all. Amendments don't come along that often, and a lot of people don't realize this. What fewer people realize is that amendments can originate in the states as well; they do not have to be originally offered by the federal government. This method is in the Constitution but has not ever been implemented. If the states initiate an amendment, the federal government only tells the states what method will be used to ratify-- either by state legislatures, or by state conventions gathered for this purpose.
States have asked congress for of the following proposed amendments to the constitution except what?
States have requested various proposed amendments to the Constitution, but one notable exception is the repeal of the Second Amendment. While there have been discussions around gun control and the Second Amendment's implications, no significant movement has emerged from states formally seeking its repeal. Instead, proposals often focus on issues like term limits for Congress, balanced budget amendments, or campaign finance reform.
Are any of the amendments from the Hartford Convention similar to the real amendments in the constitution?
Yes, some of the proposed amendments from the Hartford Convention in 1814 mirrored ideas found in the U.S. Constitution. For example, they suggested limiting the terms of office for the President and requiring a two-thirds majority in Congress for declarations of war, reflecting a concern for checks and balances. However, these proposals were not adopted, and the convention is often seen as a reactionary measure rather than a successful reform initiative.
