0
What else can I help you with?
What is an example of a reductio ad absurdum fallacy in a logical argument?
An example of a reductio ad absurdum fallacy in a logical argument is when someone argues that if we allow people to have freedom of speech, then they will start saying harmful and dangerous things, so we should not allow freedom of speech at all.
Which of the following is an example of an authoritarian government?
A government that does not allow normal citizens to participate
What is pseudo argument?
A pseudo-argument lacks a reasonable argument. It doesnÃ?t allow the possibility of growth and change or the evidence to back up claims that have been made.
Which of the-following is not an example of racial equality?
A bank that offers different interest rates for Asians
What do Syllogisms in deductive reasoning allow for?
Syllogisms in deductive reasoning allow for the logical inference of a conclusion based on two premises. They provide a structured way to determine the validity of an argument by following a set of rules. This form of reasoning is useful in drawing definitive conclusions from given information.
What statement contains an example of logical fallicies?
A statement that contains an example of logical fallacies might be: "You shouldn't listen to Jane's argument about climate change because she's not a scientist." This demonstrates the ad hominem fallacy, where the argument attacks Jane's character or qualifications rather than addressing the validity of her argument itself. Another example is: "If we allow students to redo exams, soon they'll expect to redo all their assignments," which is a slippery slope fallacy that suggests a minor action will lead to extreme consequences without evidence.
What is an argument in favor of affirmation action?
legislation is necessary to allow minorities to overcome generations of discrimination
How is the cosmological argument convincing?
Actually it isn't. Or at least, not everybody is convinced. It has several large loopholes; for example:* The cosmological argument assumes that everything must have a cause; therefore, it says, the Universe must have a cause. But if you assume that there is a God who created the Universe, this God (applying the same argument) must itself have a cause. * Even if we assume that something created the Universe, the cosmological argument doesn't allow you to make any conclusions about the identity of the creator... or creators. There might be a single God, many gods, or we might (for example) be part of a computer simulation on a "higher level"; and the "cause" might not even be an intelligent being, but random chance.
What is a pseudo argument?
A pseudo argument is a statement that may appear to be an argument but lacks the required components of a valid argument, such as premises and conclusions that logically support each other. It may give the appearance of making a point but fails to provide sufficient evidence or reasoning to support its claim.
Which is an argument in favor of free trade?
Government subsidies to private companies will allow those companies to export more of their goods
What will allow a current to pass?
A metal, for example.
What is the future tense of allows?
The future tense of "allows" is "will allow." For example, "She allows me to borrow her car" in future tense would be "She will allow me to borrow her car."
