Federalists
Patrick Henry was likely to be skeptical or opposed to the new Constitution, as he famously advocated for stronger state sovereignty and feared a powerful central government. He believed that the Constitution lacked sufficient protections for individual liberties and could lead to tyranny. Henry's concerns about federal overreach and the absence of a Bill of Rights would have fueled his apprehension regarding the new framework of government.
a loose interpretation of the Constitution. Hamilton advocated a loose interpretation of the Constitution and by doing so strengthened the U.S. economy as the first Secretary of the Treasury. He advocated a strong federal government, a national bank, a reduction in the public debt, and the building of a navy.
Emilio Aguinaldo's philosophy was centered on the fight for Philippine independence and nationalism. He believed in the Filipino people's capability to govern themselves and advocated for unity and self-determination. Aguinaldo's actions during the Philippine Revolution and his efforts in establishing the First Philippine Republic reflect his philosophy of independence and sovereignty.
Rationalismwas advocated as the primary source and Legitimacyfor Authority
The Whig pary advocated a loose interpretation of the Constitution and high protective tariff.
The 55 white men who wrote the constitution were the cream of the colonies and the wealthy educated men. They supported the constitution and didn't ask for others to support it.
It is Alexander Hamilton's plan for the US Constitution that advocated eliminating state sovereignty and consolidating the states into a single nation. The plan featured a bicameral legislature, the lower house elected by the people for three years. The upper house would be elected by electors chosen by the people and would serve for life.
3 branches of government.
He advocated burning the constitution because it allowed slavery. He wanted to free all slaves with no compensation to their owners which called for a war on the South.
Roger Sherman, Gouverneur Morris, and James Wilson played pivotal roles in the drafting and ratification of the U.S. Constitution. Sherman contributed to the Great Compromise, which established a bicameral legislature balancing representation for both large and small states. Morris was responsible for the final wording of the Constitution and advocated for a strong central government. Wilson, a key proponent of popular sovereignty, helped shape the framework for representation and was instrumental in the debates leading to the Constitution's ratification.
The Federalist vs. Anti-Federalist debate created a foundational dialogue about the balance of power between the federal government and the states. Federalists advocated for a strong central government to ensure stability and unity, while Anti-Federalists feared that such power would threaten individual liberties and state sovereignty. This debate ultimately led to the inclusion of the Bill of Rights in the Constitution, addressing Anti-Federalist concerns and establishing protections for individual freedoms. It also laid the groundwork for ongoing discussions about federalism and governance in the United States.