yes
The Roman judges were called "praetors".
Judges use a variety of tools to aid in the decision-making process, including legal research databases, case law, statutes, court rules, precedents, legal arguments presented by attorneys, and their own legal knowledge and expertise. In addition, judges may also utilize judicial clerks, court staff, and legal professionals to assist in reviewing and analyzing cases.
Appellate judges look for errors in the lower court's decision, whether the law was correctly applied, and if the trial was fair. They focus on legal arguments and evidence presented, rather than re-trying the case.
"Decided" as a dispute. When a judge decides a case, it is said that the judge has adjudicated the case. (It is possible for legal disputes to be settled by arbiters other than actual judges.)
Judges use legal knowledge, court rules, and judicial discretion to oversee legal proceedings, make rulings on pre-trial motions, determine the admissibility of evidence, and issue verdicts or judgments in criminal and civil cases. Additionally, judges rely on legal precedent, statutes, and case law to guide their decisions.
"Precedent" means "that which comes before". In making an interpretation of the law, judges will examine the decisions of judges who decided similar cases. If the case is sufficiently similar (the legal term for this is "on point"), the judge will adopt the reasoning of the earlier judge. This is called following a precedent.
"Precedent" means "that which comes before". In making an interpretation of the law, judges will examine the decisions of judges who decided similar cases. If the case is sufficiently similar (the legal term for this is "on point"), the judge will adopt the reasoning of the earlier judge. This is called following a precedent.
In legal proceedings, questions of law involve interpreting and applying the law, while questions of fact involve determining what actually happened in a case. Judges decide questions of law, while juries or judges decide questions of fact.
The collective nouns are:a bench of judgesa panel of judges
The decisions for the Court of Appeals are typically made by a panel of judges, usually consisting of three judges assigned to hear each case. These judges review the case record, hear oral arguments, and deliberate before issuing a written opinion. The majority opinion of the panel constitutes the decision, while dissenting opinions may also be issued by judges who disagree with the majority view. Ultimately, the judges' interpretations of law and legal precedents guide the decisions.
Judges typically spend their time reviewing case materials, conducting legal research, writing opinions, attending legal conferences or continuing education events, and meeting with attorneys to discuss cases. Additionally, they may also engage in community outreach or volunteer work related to the justice system.