0
What else can I help you with?
In a 2004 case involving the issue of whether a US citizen accused of terrorist acts is entitled to constitutional protections the Supreme Court held that such citizens?
In the 2004 case Hamdi vs. Rumsfield the Supreme Court held that citizens accused of terrorist acts are entitled to constitutional protections. Hamdi, a US citizen was captured in Afghanistan and turned over to the US military. He was classified as a enemy combatant.
What right does the accused have with regard to who determines his or her legal guilt or innocence?
the right to vote
Who was accused of passing military information to the soviet union?
white
Which wife of Henry VIII was accused of beheading him?
Henry VIII was not beheaded, therefore none of his wives were accused of that.
Is the defendant being accused or accusing someone?
The Defendent is "being accused", therefore defending one's self
Who represents the accused during a court martial?
Either a civilian lawyer hired by the accused or a military lawyer provided by JAG.
What Alfred dreyfus was accused of in the deyfus affair?
Passing military secrets to the Germans.
What is an Anti Terrorist Clearance Certificate?
The anti-terrorist clearance certificate is a trick that online scammers use to make money. Once an unsuspecting person has been accused of terrorism, he is asked by the scammers to pay a certain amount of money if he wants clearance.
What is the climax for the book called borderline by allan stratton?
it is when Arman, sammys dad gets taken to jail for being accused of a terriost by shaking hands with Hassan`` the terrorist ``
Who is tried in military tribunals?
Military tribunals are generally used to try military personnel accused of violating military laws and regulations. This includes members of the armed forces who are alleged to have committed crimes such as desertion, insubordination, or other offenses that fall under military jurisdiction. In certain circumstances, civilians, including foreign nationals, may also be tried in military tribunals if they are accused of committing offenses against the military or in situations where civilian courts are deemed inappropriate.
What is the difference between military tribunals and court martial?
A military tribunal is where a military court has jurisdiction over enemy combatants, or people who are in military custody or have been accused of war crimes. Courts martials have jurisdiction over its own military members.
What is the differences between military tribunals and court-martial?
A military tribunal is where a military court has jurisdiction over enemy combatants, or people who are in military custody or have been accused of war crimes. Courts martials have jurisdiction over its own military members.
