Whomever would or could change the meaning of words, thus changing the language.
In the debate, Webster argued that states did not have the power to nullify a federal law. He also argued that states could not secede from the Union. Daniel Webster held several offices throughout his career, including Senator from Massachusetts.
Dartmouth College vs. Woodward
Dartmouth College vs. Woodward, 17 US 518 (1819)
Daniel Webster
Daniel Webster agreed to compromise with proslavery senators primarily to preserve the Union and maintain peace in a nation increasingly divided over the issue of slavery. He believed that compromise was necessary to prevent the secession of Southern states and to uphold the Constitution. Additionally, Webster aimed to strengthen his political influence and appeal to a broader constituency by advocating for a middle ground that could stave off conflict. His famous "Seventh of March" speech in 1850 exemplified this pragmatic approach, emphasizing the need for unity over ideological purity.
No i can be changed
Daniel Webster believed that women's primary role was in the domestic sphere as wives and mothers. He did not support women working outside the home, as he believed it could undermine societal and family values.
Daniel Webster supported tariffs primarily to protect American industry and promote economic growth. He believed that tariffs would shield nascent American manufacturers from foreign competition, thereby fostering domestic production and job creation. Additionally, Webster viewed tariffs as a means to unify the nation economically, as they could stimulate development in various regions, particularly in the North. Overall, his support for tariffs aligned with his vision of a strong, industrialized America.
The amendment process was added so the constitution could change and grow.
so people could kill everyone of the confederation
There was no particular event that caused the authors of the constitution to meet to create a new constitution. However, Shay's rebellion could perhaps be labeled as the most important singular event which caused the authors of the Constitution to convene.
In order to ensure that southern states could not simply change their constitution after they were re-admitted