0
What else can I help you with?
In the Webster-Hayne debate Daniel Webster argued that?
In the debate, Webster argued that states did not have the power to nullify a federal law. He also argued that states could not secede from the Union. Daniel Webster held several offices throughout his career, including Senator from Massachusetts.
Supreme court case in which Daniel Webster successfully argued that a state could not change a legal charter once granted?
Dartmouth College vs. Woodward
What is the Supreme Court case in which Daniel Webster successfully argued that a state could not change legal charter once granted?
Dartmouth College vs. Woodward, 17 US 518 (1819)
What senator held that states could not nullify a federal law and said that liberty and union were inseparable?
Daniel Webster
Why did Daniel Webster agree to compromise with proslavery senators?
Daniel Webster agreed to compromise with proslavery senators primarily to preserve the Union and maintain peace in a nation increasingly divided over the issue of slavery. He believed that compromise was necessary to prevent the secession of Southern states and to uphold the Constitution. Additionally, Webster aimed to strengthen his political influence and appeal to a broader constituency by advocating for a middle ground that could stave off conflict. His famous "Seventh of March" speech in 1850 exemplified this pragmatic approach, emphasizing the need for unity over ideological purity.
No amendment in the constitution could ever change?
No i can be changed
What was Daniel Websters view on women working?
Daniel Webster believed that women's primary role was in the domestic sphere as wives and mothers. He did not support women working outside the home, as he believed it could undermine societal and family values.
Why did Daniel Webster was supporting the Tariffs?
Daniel Webster supported tariffs primarily to protect American industry and promote economic growth. He believed that tariffs would shield nascent American manufacturers from foreign competition, thereby fostering domestic production and job creation. Additionally, Webster viewed tariffs as a means to unify the nation economically, as they could stimulate development in various regions, particularly in the North. Overall, his support for tariffs aligned with his vision of a strong, industrialized America.
How did the view of Calhoun and Webster differ?
John C. Calhoun and Daniel Webster had fundamentally different views on the role of states versus the federal government. Calhoun championed states' rights and advocated for the idea of nullification, believing that states could reject federal laws they deemed unconstitutional. In contrast, Webster emphasized the importance of national unity and a strong federal government, arguing that the Constitution was designed to create a single nation rather than a loose confederation of states. Their debates highlighted the growing sectional tensions in the United States, particularly over issues like slavery and states' authority.
The Framers provided this section of the constitution for a changing nation amendments?
The amendment process was added so the constitution could change and grow.
How is the US Constitution a document subject to change and interpretation?
so people could kill everyone of the confederation
What event prompted delegates to write a new constitution?
There was no particular event that caused the authors of the constitution to meet to create a new constitution. However, Shay's rebellion could perhaps be labeled as the most important singular event which caused the authors of the Constitution to convene.
