They were afraid Congress might try to end Slavery or the Slave trade
Blacks should be given the right to vote.
D. whether the federal government should have the power to regulate slavery.
The Constitutional Convention delegates resolved the issue of Southern representation in Congress through the Three-Fifths Compromise. This agreement determined that for the purposes of representation and taxation, enslaved individuals would be counted as three-fifths of a person. This compromise allowed Southern states to gain greater representation in the House of Representatives while acknowledging the contentious nature of slavery without directly addressing it. The compromise was pivotal in balancing the interests of both Northern and Southern states during the formation of the Constitution.
The Three-Fifths Compromise was a compromise reached between delegates from southern states and those from northern states during the 1787 United States Constitutional Convention. The debate was over if, and if so, how, slaves would be counted when determining a state's total population for constitutional purposes.
The Constitutional Convention left the slave trade untaxed and untouched. Delegates from the southern States were naturally wary about the prospect of Congress being able to regulate America's interstate and foreign trade. They were afraid that the North would use its influence in Congress to levy taxes on the slave trade and the cotton trade. The delegates from the South pushed for, and won, a compromise on the matter: the Commerce and Slave Trade Compromise. This agreement made it so Congress could regulate interstate and foreign trade, but could not tax exports. This meant that cotton exports from the South would not be affected. In addition, Congress was forbidden from regulating the slave trade for 20 years.
Delegates to the Constitutional Convention of 1787 agreed to the Three-Fifths Compromise as a solution to the contentious issue of how to count enslaved individuals for purposes of representation and taxation. This compromise stipulated that each enslaved person would be counted as three-fifths of a person, thereby balancing the interests of Southern states, which had large enslaved populations, with those of Northern states, which had fewer. The compromise allowed Southern states to gain more representation in Congress while still acknowledging the contentious nature of slavery.
Slave trade became an important issue during the Constitutional Convention. Southern slaveholders did not want the Congress to take the power over slave trade while controlling foreign affairs. So they only let the Congress have power over trade, excluding slave trade, for next twenty years.
Slave trade became an important issue during the Constitutional Convention. Southern slaveholders did not want the Congress to take the power over slave trade while controlling foreign affairs. So they only let the Congress have power over trade, excluding slave trade, for next twenty years.
Georgia
The debate about slavery at the Constitutional Convention of 1787 centered on how to address the institution in the new Constitution, reflecting deep divisions between Northern and Southern states. Southern delegates sought to protect slavery and ensure representation for enslaved individuals in Congress through mechanisms like the Three-Fifths Compromise, which counted enslaved people as three-fifths of a person for apportionment purposes. In contrast, many Northern delegates aimed to limit the expansion of slavery and sought to prevent it from being enshrined in the new framework of government. Ultimately, the compromises made during the convention laid the groundwork for ongoing tensions over slavery that would eventually lead to the Civil War.
wanted congress to leave slave trade alone, and said if it was banished, the southern states would not ratify the constitution.
On July 13, 1787, at the Constitutional Convention, delegates Charles Pinckney and Gouverneur Morris engaged in a heated exchange over slavery. Pinckney defended the institution of slavery, arguing for its economic importance to the Southern states, while Morris condemned slavery as a moral wrong and criticized its implications for the nation’s values. Their debate highlighted the deep divisions and contentious nature of the slavery issue among the delegates.