Someone may choose to plead guilty in order to accept responsibility for their actions, potentially receive a lighter sentence, avoid a lengthy and costly trial, or to show remorse and seek leniency from the court.
When someone successfully uses the insanity plea then they would plead not guilty by reason of insanity
Overwhelmingly obvious proof (evidence) of the offense would lead a guilty defendant to just go ahead and plead to the charge.
You would have to go to court and plead your case.
I would plead not guilty and put the burden on the state to convict you as you dont really know what evidence they have. If you plead not guilty, the prosecutor must hand over any evidence to your attorney allowing her/him to assess your situation.
They do not want to plead guilty and therefore accept responsibility, but evidence against them is so strong that if they take it to trial they acknowledge that they would be found guilty.
The same thing that would happen today. If you plead guilty, there is no trial and your are sentenced, but more lightly than if you'd plead not guilty. Confessors were just jailed instead of being killed.
No. If you pled not guilty but were not granted a Public Defender, you would be given an opportunity (called a "continuance") to obtain counsel. When you came back with counsel they could either continue your plea of not guilty and prepare to defend you or (after consulting with you) plead you guilty and attempt to obtain the best terms possible.
Then you would be found guilty of ACS, whatever that may be. Assault to Cause Serious bodily injury, as a guess.
Question doesn't make sense. You can plead guilty AT ANY TIME during a judicial proceeding, you don't have to ask for a stipulation (judge's permission) to do so.
To plead means to beg. If you plead for someone, you could also be leading a legal case. Another term for that would be to argue a case. You could also say cajole instead of beg.
Yes you can but you need to be aware that it has the same legal effect as a guilty plea. If you plead no contest you will have a conviction on your record. It would be the same as if had plead guilty or been convicted after a trial.
Nolo Contendre (i.e.: I choose not to contest) It is an acknowledgment by the defendant that believe the prosecution has sufficient evidence against them to convict, and while they don't want to plead "guilty" they simply choose not to challenge the charge.