It is a common misconception that Babylonian laws were overtly harsh. For example, in most societies those days many crimes that in Babylon would mean that the criminal had to compensate for the damage caused/property stolen (usually tenfold) - would mean that the perpetrator would instantly be put to death. Though in case if the criminal had nothing to pay with, he'd be executed. One could say that they were not especially harsh for the time, instead were more fair and just than most.
Babylonian laws were very advanced for their time, Code of Hammurabi has one of the earliest examples of the idea of presumption of innocence, and also gives right for both the accuser and accused to be able to present evidence.
Code of Hammurabi also recognizes importance of intent. For example, person accidentally causing death of another person would only be fined, and not to be put to death himself.
Uncivilised The Romans were uncivilised when it came to living. The rich Romans lived a luxurious life living in a in a big house. They had slaves to accomplish all of there needs. On the other hand, the slaves were all crammed into one room for the night. They were not treating them fairly. The Romans had a great way of entertainment, however, it was considered uncivilized because it threatened some people with possible death. It was called Gladiators. It involved 1 slave fighting against a lion or a similar animal which then ended in the slave dying.
In antiquity it was common for punishments to be harsh.
A Chinese philosophy with harsh laws and punishments
Lawmakers in the 1700s increased punishments as a way to deter crime and maintain social order. There was a belief that harsh punishments would act as a strong deterrent and reduce criminal behavior. Additionally, there was a shift towards more punitive approaches to justice during this time period.
No it would only fuel the thirst to not be apprehended, knowing what would happen to yourself if caught you would have no reason to be taken alive.
Extra-harsh discipline with punishments to match!
In the 1300s, crime and punishment were often harsh and brutal. Punishments included public executions, floggings, amputations, and exile. The justice system was often based on retribution and deterrence, with a focus on maintaining social order through fear and punishment.
Soft punishments don't work. They didn't have enough resources to run huge prisons full of murderers who will never work a day in their lives. We do, so we have the luxury of soft punishments.
The people of today have realized that past punishments are too harsh and cause undue pain and suffering.
The Eighth Amendment prohibits the government from imposing cruel and unusual punishment on individuals. This means that punishments cannot be excessively harsh or disproportionate to the crime committed.
She isn't bad but sometimes she gives harsh punishments.
I think it was because they had harsh laws and punishments.