answersLogoWhite

0

The delegates rejected a requirement for unanimous ratification of the Constitution primarily because they recognized that achieving unanimous consent among the thirteen states would be nearly impossible. They aimed for a more practical approach, opting for a requirement of approval by only nine states to facilitate the establishment of a functional national government. This decision reflected a balance between ensuring broad support and allowing for efficient governance, acknowledging the need for compromise in the face of diverse state interests.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

4d ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Was the ratification of the Bill of Rights unanimous?

Yes.


Why did the final paragraph of the constitution state done in the convention by the unanimous consent of the states present?

The debates and compromises that went into creating the U.S. Constitution were done at a constitutional convention to which Rhode Island refused to send delegates.


Why did the final paragraph of the constitution state done in convention by the unanimous consent of the states present..?

The debates and compromises that went into creating the U.S. Constitution were done at a constitutional convention to which Rhode Island refused to send delegates.


Why did the final paragraph of the Constitution state done in convention by the unanimous consent of the state present ..?

The debates and compromises that went into creating the U.S. Constitution were done at a constitutional convention to which Rhode Island refused to send delegates.


Why did the final paragraph of the constitution state done in convention by the unanimous consent of the states present...?

The debates and compromises that went into creating the U.S. Constitution were done at a constitutional convention to which Rhode Island refused to send delegates.


Why did the final paragraph of the Constitution state done in convention by the unanimous consent of the state's present?

The debates and compromises that went into creating the U.S. Constitution were done at a constitutional convention to which Rhode Island refused to send delegates.


Why did the final paragraph of the Constitution state and ldquoDone in Convention by the Unanimous Consent of the States present?

The debates and compromises that went into creating the U.S. Constitution were done at a constitutional convention to which Rhode Island refused to send delegates.


Why did the amendment and ratification process change from unanimous to a majority vote?

The amendment and ratification process changed from requiring unanimous consent to a majority vote to facilitate a more practical and efficient governance structure. The Founding Fathers recognized that achieving unanimous approval would be nearly impossible, given the diverse interests and opinions of the states. By allowing amendments to be ratified by a majority, the process became more accessible, enabling necessary changes to the Constitution while still maintaining a level of consensus among the states. This shift aimed to balance flexibility with stability in the constitutional framework.


If you go to trial for a crime the constitution guarantees us ''a jury of your peers'' who are your peers?

There is nothing in the Constitution or Bill of Rights that guarantees a trial by a jury of one's peers. The 6th Amendment refers only to an impartial jury. In fact it does not mention a requirement of 12 jurors not that their decision be unanimous.


What state had the highest percentage of people vote in favor of ratifying the constitution?

Delaware had the highest percentage of people vote in favor of ratifying the Constitution. In December 1787, Delaware became the first state to ratify the Constitution, with a vote of 30 to 0 in favor, reflecting unanimous support among its delegates. This strong endorsement demonstrated Delaware's commitment to the new federal framework.


What do you think about the requirement for jury verdicts to be unanimous - do you think jury verdicts should be unanimous Why or why not?

The requirement for jury verdicts to be unanimous is a fundamental aspect of the justice system. Some argue that unanimity ensures fair and just decisions, as it reflects the collective agreement of all jurors. Others believe that allowing for non-unanimous verdicts could lead to quicker resolutions and prevent hung juries. Ultimately, the decision on whether jury verdicts should be unanimous or not depends on the balance between ensuring justice and efficiency in the legal process.


What article of the article of confederation requires that a unanimous consent of the state was needed in order to adopt or ratify an amendment. To the constitution?

The requirement for unanimous consent of the states to adopt or ratify an amendment is found in Article XIII of the Articles of Confederation. This article stipulates that any alteration or amendment to the Articles would require the approval of all thirteen states. This provision made it extremely difficult to amend the Articles, contributing to the eventual decision to draft a new Constitution.