A judge may change during a case under advisement due to various reasons, such as a conflict of interest, health issues, or reassignment within the court system. This change ensures that the case is handled fairly and without bias, maintaining the integrity of the judicial process. Additionally, it may be necessary to ensure timely resolution or to manage caseloads effectively. Such transitions are typically governed by legal protocols to ensure continuity and fairness.
In a law library, "under advisement" refers to a situation where a judge or legal authority is considering a case or legal issue and has not yet reached a decision. It indicates that the matter is being reviewed and analyzed, often after hearing arguments or reviewing submissions from involved parties. This status allows the judge time to deliberate before issuing a ruling or order.
Yes, "under advisement" typically indicates that a decision on a case or charge is pending. It means that a judge or decision-maker is considering the evidence and arguments presented before making a ruling. This status suggests that the case is not yet resolved, and a final decision is still forthcoming.
Under the advisement of my lawyer I can' make a comment at this time.
"Taken under advisement" in the context of a Florida traffic citation means that the judge or court is considering the case but has not made a final decision. It typically indicates that the judge may need more time to review evidence, listen to arguments, or evaluate circumstances before rendering a verdict or sentence. During this period, the judge may also seek additional information or clarification on specific points related to the citation.
I'll think about it.
No it doesn't
Write to the judge with jurisdiction over the case expressing their wishes or engage the services of an attorney or guardian ad litem to petition the court with the same. The judge will take the child's wishes under advisement and their rationale behind them and may or may not order custody modification based on the same.
I appreciate your concern and I'll take your comments under advisement.
The judge has the option of dismissing the case, but they usually defer to the prosecutor and grant another hearing so that the prosecutor (or law enforcement) can look into why the complainant failed to show.
Yes, sentencing is totally under the purview of the presiding judge in accordance with the sentencing laws of the state.
wow, did you copy this offf of a science worksheet? lol and it is "it changes" and when it goes under physical change "it remains the same"
wow, did you copy this offf of a science worksheet? lol and it is "it changes" and when it goes under physical change "it remains the same"