answersLogoWhite

0

According to criminological theories, several explanations exist regarding the rationale for the commission of crime(s). On a fundamental level, three things must exist: 1) a victim, 2) an opportunity and, 3) lack of a supervisory presence (witnesses). There are other possible explanations such as labeling theory, social learning theory, etc.

As an aside, there are several important items related to crime that are misconceptions. First, sexual offenders do NOT recidivate (recommit sex crimes) at a high rate. I have seen this rate in the media to be reported as high as 90%. This is absolutely false. Sexual offenders actually have one of the lowest recidivism rates for same offense of any offender. In other words, sex offenders have a very, very low likelihood of committing another sexual offense. One more note on this - the sex offender registry is a joke based off of political need instead of criminological efficacy.

Lastly, the perceived need for increased police officers to address perceived high crime rates (rates which are currently very comparable to the 1960s) is unfounded. Studies have shown that an increase in the number of police personnel has, at best, a minimal effect on crime. As a public we must understand that the police were designed to be a REACTIVE force; not a PREVENTATIVE force. Yes, an increase in police on the streets may create faster response times and maybe even higher arrest/clearance rates (even though this has not yet been supported by the literature) but the crime for which the police were called has already committed.

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions