It is customary, and it is done out of respect to the jury and/or judge who renders the judgement.
An arbitrator is a third party who hears both sides of an argument and then makes an impartial decision. The decision announced by an arbitrator is often as binding as if it was announced by a judge.
A defense attorney might choose not to call the defendant to the stand to avoid the risk of the defendant providing damaging testimony that could undermine their case. The defendant's credibility may be questioned, or they might inadvertently reveal information that could be detrimental to their defense. Additionally, the attorney may feel that the prosecution has not met its burden of proof, making the defendant's testimony unnecessary. Ultimately, the decision is strategic, focusing on the overall strength of the defense case.
A decision reached by a jury is called a "verdict." This verdict determines the outcome of a trial, typically indicating whether the defendant is guilty or not guilty in criminal cases, or finding for the plaintiff or defendant in civil cases. The verdict is usually based on the evidence presented during the trial and the jury's deliberations. Once reached, it is announced in court and becomes part of the official record.
The judge asked, "Has the jury reached a decision about the guilt or innocence of this defendant?"
Will the Defendant rise and face the jury!
To Be Announced
Versus.
to be announced
means " To Be Announced
you are defendant of being a lierCorrection--The above is wrong and makes no sense --- "I call the defendant to the stand" (this is a term you would here in a court trial ----- Tigersy2k3
Yes. Once the defendant takes the stand he has to answer all relevant questions.
No, a defendant in a civil case does not have to testify. It is their choice whether or not to take the stand and provide testimony.