Judges interpret the laws and legislators (or politicians) enact the laws. The separation of powers requires that the judiciary and the legislative branches remain separate, and accordingly judges should remain politically neutral.
Achille Battaglia has written: 'I giudici e la politica' -- subject(s): Political questions and judicial power, Judges, Political aspects, Administration of Justice
In what ways are courts, judges, and justices shielded from politics and political pressure
In legal proceedings, questions of law involve interpreting and applying the law, while questions of fact involve determining what actually happened in a case. Judges decide questions of law, while juries or judges decide questions of fact.
Administrative questions are typically focused on operational processes, policies, and procedures within an organization. While administrative decisions can sometimes have political implications, they are not inherently political questions but rather related to the efficient functioning of an organization.
Roy Moore has written: 'So help me God' -- subject(s): Church and state, Judges, Political questions and judicial power, Religion and politics, Biography
Robert Juul has written: 'Some reflections on judicial activism' -- subject(s): Judges, Political questions and judicial power, Rule of law, Separation of powers
Presidents often choose federal judges from their own political party.
decrease political interference in their decisions.
Who cares, Judges are supposed to be unbiased. Look at the the judges ruling record if it is available instead of political affiliation
Judges are supposed to be politically impartial and are supposed to enforce the law. The law doesn't have a political party or agenda, so the neither should the judges.
their own political party
Judges can interpret the law in any way they choose. If they are elected they decisions may be skewed for political reasons