Various states have differing regulations for the number of jurors - usually having to do with the seriousness (or lack of it) of the charges.
There have always been twelve jurors on any jury panels that I know of. Does something give you the impression there should be any less? I believe twelve individuals would be able to come up with the appropriate verdict much better than six. I only say that because I realize some cases only employ six to eight jurors. But, not in Capital cases!
twelve
All twelve.
No, there only needs to be a majority as decided by the number of seated jurors.
Answer In a trial, a selected number of Jurors (mostly twelve) give a verdict on the basis of the evidence submitted in court
Twelve jurors are trying to come to a decision on whether a young man is guilty or innocent for the murder of his father.
There are six jurors in a civil trial. The stakes of money or property are not as high as a criminal trial where life or liberty can be lost.
twelve times eight is 96.
In "Twelve Angry Men," the measuring of the evidence, specifically the eight juror's insistence on examining the knife and the measurements of the crime scene, serves to highlight the importance of reasonable doubt in the judicial process. It underscores the theme of justice by demonstrating how crucial it is to scrutinize evidence critically rather than accepting it at face value. This meticulous examination also reveals the biases and preconceptions of the other jurors, ultimately leading to deeper discussions about truth, morality, and the responsibility of jurors in a trial.
If the jury cannot decide whether the accused is guilty or not, the case can be repeated but with a different selection of jurors.
If the jury cannot decide whether the accused is guilty or not, the case can be repeated but with a different selection of jurors.
There are eight twelve months (or years) in eight years.