answersLogoWhite

0

ANS1:Because it is technically possible for more than one person to have a similar DNA fingerprint, but it is impossible for someone to have their DNA fingerprint change.

So if your fingerprint is:

XXYYXYX

And the guilty persons DNA is:

XXXXYYY

It is impossible for you to be the guilty person. But, it is possible that my DNA fingerprint is also XXXXYYY - so please don't commit any crimes near my house or I might get nailed for it.

ANS2:DNA fingerprinting always has a margin of error. The error can introduce reasonable doubt. Guilt in a capital case must be proved beyond a reasonable doubt.
User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What did john Adams say that was important?

That innocence should be protected than it is that guilt that should be punished.


Why do Americans think Amanda Knox is innocent of murdering Meredith Kercher?

There is more evidence to prove her innocence than proving her guilt.


Who determines the facts in a case guilt or innocence?

A jury will be given information from lawyers, evidence, and such and base the decision of guilt on the information provided. The jury is what determines guilt. If it goes to the Supreme Court than they decide on the legality of a case. If it's a small court case than a judge may pass guilt in which you can appeal for a trial by a jury.


Did the senate served as judges in the roman republic?

Not exactly, the Roman senate acted more like a jury rather than judges. For example, if a treason trial was being held, the prosecutors and the defense would make their speeches and then the senate would cast votes as to the guilt or innocence of the person.Not exactly, the Roman senate acted more like a jury rather than judges. For example, if a treason trial was being held, the prosecutors and the defense would make their speeches and then the senate would cast votes as to the guilt or innocence of the person.Not exactly, the Roman senate acted more like a jury rather than judges. For example, if a treason trial was being held, the prosecutors and the defense would make their speeches and then the senate would cast votes as to the guilt or innocence of the person.Not exactly, the Roman senate acted more like a jury rather than judges. For example, if a treason trial was being held, the prosecutors and the defense would make their speeches and then the senate would cast votes as to the guilt or innocence of the person.Not exactly, the Roman senate acted more like a jury rather than judges. For example, if a treason trial was being held, the prosecutors and the defense would make their speeches and then the senate would cast votes as to the guilt or innocence of the person.Not exactly, the Roman senate acted more like a jury rather than judges. For example, if a treason trial was being held, the prosecutors and the defense would make their speeches and then the senate would cast votes as to the guilt or innocence of the person.Not exactly, the Roman senate acted more like a jury rather than judges. For example, if a treason trial was being held, the prosecutors and the defense would make their speeches and then the senate would cast votes as to the guilt or innocence of the person.Not exactly, the Roman senate acted more like a jury rather than judges. For example, if a treason trial was being held, the prosecutors and the defense would make their speeches and then the senate would cast votes as to the guilt or innocence of the person.Not exactly, the Roman senate acted more like a jury rather than judges. For example, if a treason trial was being held, the prosecutors and the defense would make their speeches and then the senate would cast votes as to the guilt or innocence of the person.


Why do think judges in a court of appeals are more concerned with the law and the constitution than a persons guilt or innocence?

Because the basis of most appeals is the claim that a lower Court has not applied the law properly.


Is trial by combat legal in the US?

Trial by combat is not legal in the United States. It is considered a form of dueling, which is illegal in most states. The legal system in the US is based on evidence and arguments presented in court, rather than physical combat to determine guilt or innocence.


In case of equal guilt the defender is in better position?

in case of equal guilt the position of the defendant is better than that of the plaintiff


What are songs about hating yourself and wanting your innocence back other than i want my innocence back by emilie autumn?

Hate Me - Blue October


Is it better and easier to get married at 21 than at 18?

I guess it is....... cause it will give you time to establish your career.........give you more time with your parents.................and also you will be mature enough to hadle a relatoinship


When you catch a cheater why do they verbally attack you?

There are a couple of reasons for this. People who are caught cheating are embarassed, and they feel guilt, too. Since many people can deal with anger better than they can with guilt, it's easier for them to turn the guilt into anger. That way, when you get angry back, it "justifies" their anger. Also, many people who get caught cheating are angry at the one who catches them, and angry with themselves for being caught, so that anger comes out looking like you are the main target of that anger.


Is snowboarding easier than skiing?

Skiing is def. easier than snowboarding!


Probable cause mean having more evidence against than for true or false?

True. Probable cause refers to a reasonable belief, based on facts and circumstances, that a crime has been committed or that evidence of a crime can be found in a specific location. It implies that the evidence or information available suggests a higher likelihood of guilt than innocence, though it does not require proof beyond a reasonable doubt.