Well, I'm not an expert on the Constitution, but it hardly seems likely that the founding fathers could account for all eventualities back in 1789. Over time, people, business, war, trade, the world have all changed, and our interpretations of our Constitution should adapt to an ever changing environment.
Also, Jefferson, who was one of the first "strict constructionists" had to bend the Constitution when he was elected President to buy the Louisiana Purchase without prior Congressional approval.
Strict construction takes a narrow view of laws, statutes, and the constitution. Broad construction takes a broad view of laws, statutes, and the constitution.
The draft law.
You might think that these strict construction safety rules are unnecessary, but lives have been lost performing this task.
Legal philosophy of judicial interpretation.
'strict construction' is when democratic-republican parties make sure no one is using powers that the Constitution says you cannot. Democratic-republicans are for a stronger State government.
A weak central government. a confederation, and individual rights.
In which case? There have been numerous cases where the liberal construction has prevailed and numerous cases where the strict construction was followed.
It's your interpretation of the constitution. The philosophy that allows narrow constitutional interpretation is called strict construction and the philosophy of broad constitutional interpretation is called loose construction. Thomas Jefferson and James Madison favored the strict constructions, and Alexander Hamilton favored the loose construction.
Loose construction-means that the federal government can take reasonable actions that the constitution does not specifically forbidStrict construction- people who favor strict constitution think that that federal government should do only what the constitution specifically says it can do The Loose Construction Theory is when federalists interpret the Constitution into things that are in favor of a stronger national government. There are limitations involved.
No that is false. It is an example of loose construction.
Strict construction meant that those interpreting it thought that that the government should only have powers that were expressly stated in the constitution. Like, it shouldn't stretch the limits or try to do things that the constitution didn't say specifically were ok to do.
Loose constuction.