.
In Rousseau's state of nature, freedom is the ability to act according to one's own will without being subject to the will of others. This freedom is based on individuals being in a state of equality, where they are not bound by social constraints or dependencies. Rousseau believed that in the state of nature, individuals are free to express their natural impulses and desires without interference from external forces.
The most common answer philosophers give is that in a state of nature you have total freedom to do anything you want since there is no government, but just as you have total freedom to do TO someone else what you want, they also have that freedom to do it to you. Thus insecurity is born. The remedy is to form a contract/compact with your fellow Men to establish a government that will protect you from these insecurities. However, since governments are by nature coersive, they will limit the freedom you had in a state of nature. Rational Choice theory would say that you would form such a contract/compact.
Locke means that individuals have inherent rights to their own lives, liberty, and property, and that these rights should be respected by others. In a state of perfect freedom within the bounds of the law of nature, individuals are entitled to govern themselves and make decisions without interference as long as they do not harm others or infringe on their rights. This concept forms the basis of Locke's social contract theory, where individuals enter into society to protect their rights and freedoms.
The most common answer philosophers give is that in a state of nature you have total freedom to do anything you want since there is no government, but just as you have total freedom to do TO someone else what you want, they also have that freedom to do it to you. Thus insecurity is born. The remedy is to form a contract/compact with your fellow Men to establish a government that will protect you from these insecurities. However, since governments are by nature coersive, they will limit the freedom you had in a state of nature. Rational Choice theory would say that you would form such a contract/compact.
A free man in the state of nature would be willing to give up some of his freedom to enter into social contract because it provides greater security and protection of his natural rights. By forming a government, individuals can better ensure the protection of their property and rights, creating a more stable and organized society.
Very important. Without the freedom of religion there would be state religion.
Hobbes believed that the state of nature is chaotic and individuals must surrender their rights to a central authority to achieve order through a social contract. Locke viewed the state of nature as a place of freedom and equality, where individuals form a social contract to protect their natural rights. Rousseau saw the state of nature as peaceful and egalitarian, and believed that social contracts should be created to preserve individual freedom and promote equality.
Natural righta u welcome
because of their love/devotion/passion for something. example: family
John Locke's statement means that every man has freedom as long as it stays within the confines of the law
The Bible says that perfect peace happens when we keep our mind on God (and therefore the things of God). Because of that trust in Yahweh, He gives perfect peace. "You will keep him in perfect peace, whose mind is stayed on You, because he trusts in You" Isaiah 26:3.
Thoreau envisions an ideal state where individuals live simply and harmoniously with nature, valuing independence, self-reliance, and personal freedom. He emphasizes the importance of individuals following their own conscience and pursuing a life of principle and integrity. Thoreau also advocates for a government that is limited in scope and respects the rights and liberties of its citizens.