The basic question about gun ownership would be, is it more socially useful to allow the general public to own guns or to restrict gun ownership to the police and armed forces. Arguments can be made for both sides of this debate. When members of the general public own guns, they can use those guns for legitimate purposes of self defense, or of recreational hunting or target practice etc., and in addition, this makes it harder for corrupt and dictatorial governments to get away with their crimes, since an armed populace can rise up against them. And on the other side of the debate, it is also true that the more people there are who have guns, the more easily people can use those guns to commit crimes. When we see a case such as the horrible mass shooting committed by James Holmes recently, in the movie theater, we tend to think that it would have been a good idea to prevent him from getting his hands on guns in the first place. If he went into a theater and started punching people, the casualty rate would have been much lower.
Access to health care------APEX
Yes, there is controversy surrounding Elizabeth Warren and the cookbook Pow Wow Chow.
Humans playing "god".
The controversy surrounding Trump's inaugural cake was that it was accused of being a replica of Obama's inaugural cake from 2013, leading to allegations of plagiarism.
jefferson
The controversy surrounding Odie's Oil owner involves allegations of unethical business practices, including misleading advertising and poor product quality.
No, there is no known controversy surrounding this play.
No, there is no recorded controversy surrounding the play.
The controversy surrounding Trump's inauguration cake was that it was accused of being a copy of Obama's inauguration cake from 2013. The baker of Trump's cake denied the allegations and stated that it was an original design.
In the controversy surrounding gay marriage, an Alabama judge played a role in issuing rulings and decisions that either supported or opposed the legalization of same-sex marriage in the state.
The controversy surrounding human cloning is an ethical issue. People wonder if humans have the right to create other humans and if humans do have that right, do they also have the right to take life away? The controversy is over life and death and who has the power to control them.
If you are "pro" in the gun control debate, you are for less gun control. In other words, you are "pro-gun".