There is NO good reason they should be held responsible.
Police are responsible for controlling crime.
it is a crime to adulterate foods without informing the buyer
It would depend on the exact circumstances, but generally, yes. Otherwise you become as guilty as he is -- and as responsible for the outcome.
male
They are not responsible for the crime of a 20 year old person no matter where the person lives, unless they somehow helped commit the crime in some way.
The two types of verdicts in a trial are guilty, when the defendant is found responsible for the crime charged, and not guilty, when the defendant is acquitted and found not responsible for the crime.
"Captain Assyria"
Yes, he is still responsible for his crime. Ignorance of the law is no excuse. It is your duty as a citizen to know, understand, and obey the law. This is why laws are written.
in my idea detective or police officer are responsible in crime i mean the role of a detective is so important, he goes to the crime scene,searches foe the clues and evidences,talks to the witnesses and finally he can say who ia guilty?
violent carton,teacher,parents
Nope - they can never be held responsible for a crime.
Hitler and the Nazis were responsible for the Holocaust.