answersLogoWhite

0

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Why do China Cuba and North Korea place significant restrictions on citizens' access to the Internet?

To keep antigovernment ideas away from ciitezens


What did Nicholas did for Russia?

He used secret police to monitor antigovernment activity.


Why do communists restrict freedom of speech?

Threat of overthrow


Which question is most relevant to a court when determining whether a particular type of speech can be limited?

does the speech pose a threat to the public interest


What does Hamilton seem to think greatest threat to liberty?

Stripping people from freedom of speech


What element do Roosevelt day of infamy speech and bushs 911 speech have in common?

Both recognize the threat of the enemy but emphasize America's power to defeat it.


What element do roosevelts day of infamy speech and bush's 911 speech have in common?

Both recognize the threat of the enemy but emphasize America's power to defeat it.


What unprecedented event of the 1990's led to national concern over antigovernment domestic terrorism?

the bombing of the federal building in Oklahoma City


In 1989 a nation mostly covered in dense forest changed its name from Burma to what after a wave of antigovernment riots?

All I know is that it starts with a ''M'' 8=)


If your constitution allows us free speech why are there phone bills?

Haha.. Freedom of speech is the ability to say whatever you want without the threat of being arrested for it. Phone bills and telephones have nothing to do with that because there are other ways of communicating


Hitler's speech about the upcoming Holocaust was where?

30 January 1939 in the Reichstag, but it wasn't about 'the upcoming Holocaust'. At that stage it was expressed as a threat. Please see the related question.


Why is anti-government speech a threat?

Anti-government speech can be perceived as a threat because it may incite unrest, undermine authority, and destabilize social order. Such speech can mobilize individuals or groups to challenge or revolt against governmental structures, leading to potential violence or civil disobedience. Additionally, it may erode public trust in institutions, making it difficult for governments to effectively govern and maintain public safety. However, the balance between freedom of expression and maintaining order is a complex and nuanced issue in democratic societies.